Generative frame interpolation enhances tracking of biological objects in time-lapse microscopy
Kaondal, S.; Taassob, A.; Jeon, S.; Lee, S. H.; Nunez, H. L.; Akindipe, B. A.; Lee, H.; Joo, S. Y.; Oliveira, S. M. D.; Arguello-Miranda, O.
Show abstract
Object tracking in microscopy videos is crucial for understanding biological processes. While existing methods often require fine-tuning tracking algorithms to fit the image dataset, here we explored an alternative paradigm: augmenting the image time-lapse dataset to fit the tracking algorithm. To test this approach, we evaluated whether generative video frame interpolation can augment the temporal resolution of time-lapse microscopy and facilitate object tracking in multiple biological contexts. We systematically compared the capacity of Latent Diffusion Model for Video Frame Interpolation (LDMVFI), Real-time Intermediate Flow Estimation (RIFE), Compression-Driven Frame Interpolation (CDFI), and Frame Interpolation for Large Motion (FILM) to generate synthetic microscopy images derived from interpolating real images. Our testing image time series ranged from fluorescently labeled nuclei to bacteria, yeast, cancer cells, and organoids. We showed that the off-the-shelf frame interpolation algorithms produced bio-realistic image interpolation even without dataset-specific retraining, as judged by high structural image similarity and the capacity to produce segmentations that closely resemble results from real images. Using a simple tracking algorithm based on mask overlap, we confirmed that frame interpolation significantly improved tracking across several datasets without requiring extensive parameter tuning and capturing complex trajectories that were difficult to resolve in the original image time series. Taken together, our findings highlight the potential of generative frame interpolation to improve tracking in time-lapse microscopy across diverse scenarios, suggesting that a generalist tracking algorithm for microscopy could be developed by combining deep learning segmentation models with generative frame interpolation.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Learning Classification of Lipid Droplets in Quantitative Phase Images 96%
- ConfluentFUCCI for fully-automated analysis of cell-cycle progression in a highly dense collective of migrating cells 95%
- Caveolae and scaffold detection from single molecule localization microscopy data using deep learning 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- DeLTA: Automated cell segmentation, tracking, and lineage reconstruction using deep learning 96%
- A Deep Learning approach for time-consistent cell cycle phase prediction from microscopy data 96%
- Shape-to-graph Mapping Method for Efficient Characterization and Classification of Complex Geometries in Biological Images 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- NISNet3D: Three-Dimensional Nuclear Synthesis and Instance Segmentation for Fluorescence Microscopy Images 95%
- WaveletSEG: Automatic wavelet-based 3D nuclei segmentation and analysis for multicellular embryo quantification 95%
- Automated cell boundary and 3D nuclear segmentation of cells in suspension 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hybrid machine-learning framework for volumetric segmentation and quantification of vacuoles in individual unlabeled yeast cells using holotomography 96%
- A Tailored Approach To Study Legionella Infection Using Lattice Light Sheet Microscope (LLSM) 95%
- Long-term imaging of three-dimensional hyphal development using the ePetri dish 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.