Accessible, realistic genome simulation with selection using stdpopsim
Gower, G.; Pope, N. S.; Rodrigues, M. F.; Tittes, S.; Tran, L. N.; Alam, O.; Cavassim, M. I. A.; Fields, P. D.; Haller, B. C.; Huang, X.; Jeffrey, B.; Korfmann, K.; Kyriazis, C. C.; Min, J.; Rebollo, I.; Rehmann, C. T.; Small, S. T.; Smith, C. C. R.; Tsambos, G.; Wong, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Huber, C. D.; Gorjanc, G.; Ragsdale, A.; Gronau, I.; Gutenkunst, R. N.; Kelleher, J.; Lohmueller, K. E.; Schrider, D. R.; Ralph, P. L.; Kern, A. D.
Show abstract
Selection is a fundamental evolutionary force that shapes patterns of genetic variation across species. However, simulations incorporating realistic selection along heterogeneous genomes in complex demographic histories are challenging, limiting our ability to benchmark statistical methods aimed at detecting selection and to explore theoretical predictions. stdpopsim is a community-maintained simulation library that already provides an extensive catalog of species-specific population genetic models. Here we present a major extension to the stdpopsim framework that enables simulation of various modes of selection, including background selection, selective sweeps, and arbitrary distributions of fitness effects (DFE) acting on annotated subsets of the genome (for instance, exons). This extension maintains stdpopsims core principles of reproducibility and accessibility while adding support for species-specific genomic annotations and published DFE estimates. We demonstrate the utility of this framework by comparing methods for demographic inference, DFE estimation, and selective sweep detection across several species and scenarios. Our results demonstrate the robustness of demographic inference methods to selection on linked sites, reveal the sensitivity of DFE-inference methods to model assumptions, and show how genomic features, like recombination rate and functional sequence density, influence power to detect selective sweeps. This extension to stdpopsim provides a powerful new resource for the population genetics community to explore the interplay between selection and other evolutionary forces in a reproducible, user-friendly framework.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- slendr: a framework for spatio-temporal population genomic simulations on geographic landscapes 96%
- Performance evaluation of adaptive introgression classification methods 95%
- Performance and limitations of linkage-disequilibrium-based methods for inferring the genomic landscape of recombination and detecting hotspots: a simulation study 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.