Back

Selection-free CRISPR-Cas9 editing protocol for distant Dictyostelid species

Garriga-Canut, M.; Cannon, N.; Benton, M.; Zanon, A.; Horsfield, S. T.; Scheurich, J.; Remans, K.; Lees, J.; Paix, A.; van Gestel, J.

2025-03-25 genetics
10.1101/2025.03.23.644600 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Dictyostelids are a species-rich clade of cellular slime molds that are widely found in soils and have been studied for over a century. Most research focusses on Dictyostelium discoideum, which - due to its ease of culturing and genetic tractability - has been adopted as a model species in the fields of developmental biology, cell biology and microbiology. Over decades, genome editing methods in D. discoideum have steadily improved but remain relatively time-consuming and limited in scope, effective in a few species only. Here, we introduce a CRISPR-Cas9 editing protocol that is cloning-free, selection-free, highly-efficient, and effective across Dictyostelid species. After optimizing our protocol in D. discoideum, we obtained knock-out efficiencies of [~]80% and knock-in efficiencies of [~]30% without antibiotic selection. Efficiencies depend on template concentrations, insertion sizes, homology arms and target sites. Since our protocol is selection-free, we can isolate mutants as soon as one day post-transfection, vastly expediting the generation of knock-outs, fusion proteins and expression reporters. Our protocol also makes it possible to generate several knock-in mutations simultaneously in the same cells. Boosted by cell-sorting and fluorescent microscopy, we could readily apply our CRISPR-Cas9 editing protocol to phylogenetically distant Dictyostelid species, which diverged hundreds of millions of years ago and have never been genome edited before. Our protocol therefore opens the door to performing broad-scale genetic interrogations across Dicyostelids.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.