Back

Explainable machine learning identifies features and thresholds predictive of immunotherapy response

Tran, K. A.; Addala, V.; Koufariotis, L. T.; Zhang, J.; Wood, S.; Leonard, C.; Hoeijmakers, L. L.; Blank, C. U.; Crispin-Ortuzar, M.; Williams, E. D.; Kondrashova, O.; Pearson, J. V.; Waddell, N.

2025-03-25 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.03.23.643560 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundImmunotherapy has improved patient survival for multiple cancer types, including melanoma. While a variety of molecular features have been linked to response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) treatment, clinically established biomarkers, such as tumour mutation burden (TMB) and PD-L1 expression, have shown limitations in accurately categorising responders versus non-responders. Due to the complex nature of ICI response, which includes cancer intrinsic and extrinsic features within the tumour microenvironment (TME), using a single biomarker to predict response is insufficient, necessitating the need to identify accurate clinical and multi-omic molecular predictors. MethodsWe integrate clinical, DNA and RNA sequencing data from four datasets, comprising 138 melanoma patients treated with ICI, to develop machine learning models for predicting ICI response. The performance of each model was evaluated using an independent dataset of patients with cutaneous melanoma (n=53). Interactions between trained models and features were rationalised using the explainability method SHAP. ResultsThe most optimal model was the multi-omic random forest model, with AUC-ROC of 0.78 when predicting response in the independent test dataset. Using SHAP, we predicted thresholds for mutational signatures, neoantigen load, immune cell-type abundance and immune receptor LAG3 expression. The relationship between these influential features and their SHAP scores revealed numerical thresholds constituting good and poor patient response. ConclusionsThis approach highlights patient response to ICI is influenced by both cancer intrinsic and extrinsic features, as well as identifies candidate biomarkers that could inform the use of ICI and potentially assist in the selection of combination therapy in melanoma treatment.

Published in Scientific Reports (predicted rank #6) · training set

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.