Explainable machine learning identifies features and thresholds predictive of immunotherapy response
Tran, K. A.; Addala, V.; Koufariotis, L. T.; Zhang, J.; Wood, S.; Leonard, C.; Hoeijmakers, L. L.; Blank, C. U.; Crispin-Ortuzar, M.; Williams, E. D.; Kondrashova, O.; Pearson, J. V.; Waddell, N.
Show abstract
BackgroundImmunotherapy has improved patient survival for multiple cancer types, including melanoma. While a variety of molecular features have been linked to response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) treatment, clinically established biomarkers, such as tumour mutation burden (TMB) and PD-L1 expression, have shown limitations in accurately categorising responders versus non-responders. Due to the complex nature of ICI response, which includes cancer intrinsic and extrinsic features within the tumour microenvironment (TME), using a single biomarker to predict response is insufficient, necessitating the need to identify accurate clinical and multi-omic molecular predictors. MethodsWe integrate clinical, DNA and RNA sequencing data from four datasets, comprising 138 melanoma patients treated with ICI, to develop machine learning models for predicting ICI response. The performance of each model was evaluated using an independent dataset of patients with cutaneous melanoma (n=53). Interactions between trained models and features were rationalised using the explainability method SHAP. ResultsThe most optimal model was the multi-omic random forest model, with AUC-ROC of 0.78 when predicting response in the independent test dataset. Using SHAP, we predicted thresholds for mutational signatures, neoantigen load, immune cell-type abundance and immune receptor LAG3 expression. The relationship between these influential features and their SHAP scores revealed numerical thresholds constituting good and poor patient response. ConclusionsThis approach highlights patient response to ICI is influenced by both cancer intrinsic and extrinsic features, as well as identifies candidate biomarkers that could inform the use of ICI and potentially assist in the selection of combination therapy in melanoma treatment.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Tumour gene expression signature in primary melanoma predicts long-term outcomes: A prospective multicentre study 95%
- Deactivation of ligand-receptor interactions enhancing lymphocyte infiltration drives melanoma resistance to Immune Checkpoint Blockade 95%
- Self-Supervised Learning Reveals Clinically Relevant Histomorphological Patterns for Therapeutic Strategies in Colon Cancer 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting tumor immune microenvironment and checkpoint therapy response of head & neck cancer patients from blood immune single-cell transcriptomics 95%
- Repurposing azacitidine and carboplatin to prime for anti-PDL1 re-challenge of immunotherapy-resistant melanoma 93%
- Transformer-based deep learning integrates multi-omic data with cancer pathways 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcriptional reprogramming and constitutive PD-L1 expression in melanoma are associated with dedifferentiation and activation of interferon and tumor necrosis factor signaling pathways 94%
- Development of a Metastatic Uveal Melanoma Prognostic risk Score (MUMPS) for use in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors 93%
- Use of high-plex data reveals novel insights into the tumour microenvironment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Explainable Machine Learning for Preoperative Relapse Prediction in Molecularly Stratified Endometrial Cancer: A Single-Center Finnish Cohort Study 92%
- Estimating the effect of tissue- and blood-derived cell reference matrices on deconvolving bulk transcriptomic datasets 91%
- Mime: A flexible machine-learning framework to construct and visualize models for clinical characteristics prediction and feature selection 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.