Back

Comprehensive profiling of anaesthetised brain dynamics across phylogeny

Luppi, A. I.; Uhrig, L.; Tasserie, J.; Shafiei, G.; Muta, K.; Hata, J.; Okano, H.; Golkowski, D.; Ranft, A.; Ilg, R.; Jordan, D.; Gini, S.; Liu, Z.-Q.; Yee, Y.; Signorelli, C. M.; Cofre, R.; Destexhe, A.; Menon, D.; Stamatakis, E. A.; Connor, C. W.; Gozzi, A.; Fulcher, B. D.; Jarraya, B.; Misic, B.

2025-03-24 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.03.22.644729 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Intrinsic dynamics of neuronal circuits shape information processing. Combining neuroimaging with causal perturbation offers the opportunity to understand how local dynamics mediate the link between neurobiology and functional repertoire. We compile a unique dataset of multi-scale neural activity during wakefulness and anaesthetic-induced suppression of information processing encompassing human, macaque, marmoset, mouse, zebrafish and nematode. Applying massive feature extraction, we comprehensively characterise local neural dynamics across >6,000 time-series features. Using dynamics as a common space for cross-species comparison reveals a conserved dynamical profile of anaesthesia across species, characterised by shorter intrinsic timescales of neural activity and dampened interregional synchrony. This dynamical regime is experimentally reversed in vivo by deep-brain stimulation of the macaque centromedian thalamus, restoring behavioural responsiveness. Spatially, this conserved dynamical phenotype covaries with conserved transcriptional profiles of excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission across human, macaque, marmoset and mouse cortex. Biophysical modelling provides a mechanistic link between the macroscale dynamical phenotype of anaesthesia, and microscale effects of key molecular targets on the timescales of synaptic excitation and inhibition. Altogether, comprehensive dynamical phenotyping reveals a shared neural endpoint of anaesthesia: across species and scales, anaesthetics induce spatio-temporal isolation of local neural activity.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.