Accounting for spatial interactions in the upscaling of ecosystem services
Boesing, A. L.; Le Provost, G.; Neyret, M.; Linstädter, A.; Muro, J.; Müller, J.; Jung, K.; Fischer, M.; Lange, M.; Dubovyk, O.; Magdon, P.; Bolliger, R.; Leimer, S.; Boch, S.; Renner, S.; Kleinebecker, T.; Hamer, U.; Klaus, V. H.; Wilcke, W.; Manning, P.
Show abstract
O_LIMaps of ecosystem service (ES) supply are frequently used to guide spatial planning, policy making, and ecosystem management. However, these are typically based upon coarse land-cover proxies. This approach lacks a strong mechanistic basis, and neglects spatial biodiversity dynamics and interactions among landscape properties that can modify ES provision. C_LIO_LIWe present an analytical framework for ES upscaling that incorporates spatial interactions between landscape properties to determine ES supply. The resulting models can be viewed as a spatially informed ES production function. The approach comprises seven steps that include several elements absent from most existing approaches, notably a procedure for identifying geodata variables that represent the true mechanistic drivers, the inclusion of spatial interactions in the upscaling model, and modification following expert feedback on the selected model. C_LIO_LIWe demonstrate the approach using two example ES from German grasslands: biodiversity conservation and water supply. We show that the inclusion of spatial interactions in the upscaling model improved model predictions from 15% to 33% depending on the ES evaluated. In addition, inclusion of spatial interactions led to reduced error associated with the upscaled estimates. C_LIO_LIBy overcoming several shortcomings of existing, upscaling approaches we generate resulting maps of ES supply that can more reliably inform spatial planning Further, the underlying models allow for simulation of changes in the drivers of ES supply and estimation of respective outcomes. These advantages have the potential to better link detailed local-scale ecological understanding and land management with large-scale ES supply mapping, and thus better inform decision making and spatial planning. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Using generalised dissimilarity modelling and targeted field surveys to gap-fill an ecosystem surveillance network 96%
- Restoration ecologists might not get what they want: Global change shifts trade-offs among ecosystem functions 95%
- Fit by design: Developing substrate-specific seed mixtures for functional dike grasslands 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- : A tool for modelling ecosystem resilience 95%
- Projecting spatiotemporal bioclimatic niche dynamics of endemic Pyrenean plant species under climate change: how much will we lose? 95%
- Bayesian species distribution models integrate presence-only and presence-absence data to predict deer distribution and relative abundance. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Broken Window: An algorithm for quantifying and characterizing misleading trajectories in ecological processes 94%
- Model-based ordination of pin-point cover data: effect of management on dry heathland 94%
- Transferability of stream benthic macroinvertebrate distribution models to drought-related conditions 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ecosystem services in connected catchment to coast ecosystems: monitoring to detect emerging trends 94%
- An individual, mechanistic and dynamical model to simulate urban tree growth and ecosystem services supply under future scenarios 93%
- Contribution of deep soil layers to the transpiration of a temperate deciduous forest: quantification and implications for the modelling of productivity 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.