Back

How should menorrhagia be managed in people with bleeding disorders: A systematic review of the literature and thematic synthesis

Masood, R.; Dev, V.; Gee, M.; Finch, K.; Fletcher, D.; Bamidele, O.; Traunter, J.; Allsup, D. J.; Guinn, B.

2025-03-24 hematology
10.1101/2025.03.22.25324427
Show abstract

ObjectivesTo determine how menorrhagia is managed in people with bleeding disorders. DesignA systematic review and thematic synthesis. Data sourcesPubMed, Medline, Scopus, Cochrane library, google scholar and CINAHL complete (via EBSCO). MethodsSearches were conducted on articles published from 1st January 2000 until 6th May 2024. Following deduplication, the titles and abstracts were screened for relevance. 244 primary studies were then assessed for eligibility based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies were included if they were based on primary articles and focussed on people with inherited bleeding disorders and heavy menstrual bleeding. Included studies were appraised for risk of bias and quality assurance using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale, following which data was systematically coded to generate descriptive and analytical themes. ResultsWe identified 16 eligible articles of which 13 were included in a thematic synthesis. These included prospective and retrospective clinical studies, cross-sectional studies and randomised control trials encompassing over 893 participants. Thematic synthesis identified hormonal treatments, such as the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), to be largely effective in the symptom management of HMB in IBD and associated with improved quality of patient life. Treatment of HMB patients with LNG-IUS, followed by tranexamic acid (TA) or 1-deamino-8-d-arginine vasopressin (DDAVP), the trade name for desmopressin, commonly led to amenorrhea. Technological approaches to the management of HMB in IBD included the use of mobile technology to encourage treatment compliance. These management strategies led to an improvement in reported QoL by patients with IBD. This review had limitations including the exclusion of some articles that may have limited generalisability. The Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms used focussed on HMB as opposed to abnormal menstrual bleeding, potentially directing the identified recommendations for clinical practice. Based on the findings of this thematic review, the use of LNG-IUS as first line therapy for those with HMB, followed by the use of combination therapy such as TA and desmopressin, would be recommended. These measures should be adopted in both primary and secondary care settings. We identified the need to strengthen counselling and communication between specialists involved in the care of those with HMB and IBD, and the need to increase awareness of HMB in IBD through public and patient education. Data availability statementAll data presented is secondary to published studies and available within the public domain. RegistrationPROSPERO registration number: CRD42023452533 Key MessagesO_LIWhat is already known on this topic - Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is often a symptom of inherited bleeding disorders (IBD) in females and can have a significant impact on the quality of life of an individual. C_LIO_LIWhat this study adds - A systematic review and thematic analysis of the currently available literature allowed the identification of best practise management options for patients with IBD and HMB. A thematic synthesis was used to identify best practice for IBD patient treatment and management of HMB, which will improve patient quality of life. C_LIO_LIHow this study might affect research, practice or policy - This study of existing literature and thematic synthesis has been used to provide recommendations to haematologists and gynaecologists to support evidence based best practise recommendations on how to treat patients with HMB consequent to IBDs. C_LI

Matching journals

1
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 32%
15.5%
2
British Journal of Haematology
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.2%
155× avg
3
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 99 published papers
Top 0.5%
15× avg
4
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Wiley · based on 15 published papers
#1
72× avg
5
Vaccines
MDPI AG · based on 131 published papers
Top 1%
17× avg
6
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
BMJ · based on 10 published papers
Top 0.5%
67× avg
7
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 51%
3.0%
8
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 31%
2.8%
9
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 14 published papers
Top 0.1%
51× avg
10
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.4%
39× avg
11
Leukemia
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.6%
29× avg
12
Public Health in Practice
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.2%
35× avg
13
Frontiers in Physiology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 18 published papers
Top 1%
13× avg
14
BMC Public Health
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 148 published papers
Top 15%
2.0× avg
15
Blood
American Society of Hematology · based on 14 published papers
Top 0.6%
22× avg
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 9%
2.7× avg
17
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Elsevier BV · based on 115 published papers
Top 12%
2.6× avg
18
Frontiers in Immunology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 140 published papers
Top 5%
4.1× avg
19
European Journal of Neurology
Wiley · based on 20 published papers
Top 2%
15× avg
20
Blood Advances
American Society of Hematology · based on 16 published papers
Top 0.9%
17× avg
21
Aging
Impact Journals, LLC · based on 18 published papers
Top 3%
8.3× avg
22
PLOS Medicine
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 95 published papers
Top 12%
2.3× avg
23
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 166 published papers
Top 9%
1.2%
24
PLOS Digital Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 88 published papers
Top 12%
0.8%
25
Diagnostics
MDPI AG · based on 36 published papers
Top 6%
3.3× avg