Back

A Generalized Protein Design Ml Model Enablesgeneration Of Functional De Novo Proteins

Riley, T. P.; Matusovsky, O.; Parsa, M. S.; Kalantari, P.; Naderi, I.; Azimian, K.; Wei, K. Y.

2025-03-22 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.03.21.644400 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Traditional protein design is fundamentally constrained by known sequences and folds. To break free from these limitations, we introduce a new alternative: designing proteins directly from plain-language specifications. To achieve this, we trained MP4, a transformer-based model that maps natural language prompts to protein sequences, on a dataset of 3.2 billion points and 138k tokens. In a benchmark of 96 prompts representing a wide array of functions and contexts, MP4 excelled by simultaneously improving on three key metrics: sequence realism, predicted fold quality, and alignment to the requested function. This high performance is particularly significant as it was achieved using only text as input which is a major departure from other models. Experimental validation confirmed our computational predictions: two de novo designs were experimentally shown to be both expressible and thermostable, with high-resolution crystallography (1.30 [A] and 1.77 [A]) ultimately revealing one to possess a paradigm-shifting novel fold. Functionally, the designs were also active, demonstrating both ATP binding and hydrolysis in vitro. This work demonstrates the realization of natural-language intent as functional proteins that express, crystallize, and catalyze. Although the underlying approach is still in early development with incomplete coverage and controllability, MP4 delivers a profound impact: it lowers the barrier to protein design and vastly expands the space for creative exploration in molecular programming.

Published in ACS Synthetic Biology (predicted rank #24) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.