SyMetrics: An Integrated Machine Learning Model for Evaluating the Pathogenicity of Synonymous Variants in the Human Genome
Bundalian, L. T.; Strnadova, M.; Garten, F.; Horn, S.; Stenzel, U.; Lemke, J.; Biskup, S.; Schulte, B.; May, P.; Bosebeck, F.; Garten, A.; Thor, D.; Schulz, A.; Hentschel, J.; Kelso, J.; Schoneberg, T.; Le Duc, D.
Show abstract
Synonymous single nucleotide variants (sSNVs), traditionally seen as neutral, are now recognized for their biological impact. To assess their relevance, we developed SyMetrics, a framework that integrates predictors of splicing, RNA stability, evolutionary conservation, codon usage, synonymous variation effects, sequence properties, and allele frequency. We analyzed all possible sSNVs across the human genome, and our machine-learning model achieved 97% accuracy in distinguishing deleterious from benign variants, with a ROC-AUC of 0.89, outperforming individual predictors. Our estimates indicate that about 1.98 {+/-} 0.17% of sSNVs absent from population databases are damaging (roughly 900, 000 sSNVs), with an odds ratio of 3.87 for deleteriousness compared to common sSNVs (p < 0.05). To validate predictions, we performed functional assays on selected sSNVs in the AVPR2 gene. In a clinical cohort, we identified 15 predicted deleterious sSNVs in genes linked to patient phenotypes; 9 were classified as (likely) pathogenic while 6 were variants of uncertain significance (VUS) per American College of Medical Genetics guidelines. For three VUS, segregation data supported their suspected inheritance patterns (de novo, X-linked). Our findings underscore the functional importance of sSNVs. To support further research and clinical applications, we provide a Python package and web application for evaluating these variants comprehensively. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=102 SRC="FIGDIR/small/25324414v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (16K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12f1627org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@57968borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@5cb42borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@38733c_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing the annotation of small ORF-altering variants using MORFEE: introducing MORFEEdb, a comprehensive catalog of SNVs affecting upstream ORFs in human 5'UTRs 95%
- A comprehensive atlas of fetal splicing patterns in the brain of adult myotonic dystrophy type 1 patients 95%
- Identifying essential genes across eukaryotes by machine learning 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic variations in G-Quadruplex forming sequences affect the transcription of human disease-related genes 96%
- Prediction of synonymous corrections by the BE-FF computational tool expands the targeting scope of base editing 95%
- Genome-wide characterization of human minisatellite VNTRs: population-specific alleles and gene expression differences 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Structure-informed classification of RyR1 variants highlights limitations of current predictors and enables clinical interpretation 96%
- 5’ splice site GC&gt;GT variants differ from GT&gt;GC variants in terms of their functionality and pathogenicity 94%
- Splicing impact of deep exonic missense variants in CAPN3 explored systematically by minigene functional assay 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Biallelic pathogenic variants in TRMT1 disrupt tRNA modification and induce a syndromic neurodevelopmental disorder 95%
- Stretch-activated ion channel TMEM63B associates with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies and progressive neurodegeneration 94%
- MRSD: a novel quantitative approach for assessing suitability of RNA-seq in the clinical investigation of mis-splicing in Mendelian disease 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.