Adverse outcomes associated with Long-Term Opioid Therapy Discontinuation in People with Chronic Non-Cancer Pain in UK Primary Care: A propensity Score Matched Cohort Study
Cai, Q.; Huang, Y.-T.; Grigoroglou, C.; Morris, C.; Allen, T.; Kontopantelis, E.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo examine adverse outcomes associated with long-term opioid therapy (L-TOT) discontinuation among people with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP). Design and settingPopulation-based matched cohort study using UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum data. PopulationL-TOT discontinuers were defined as individuals with opioid-free for [≥]180 days following an episode of L-TOT ([≥]3 opioid prescriptions within 90 days, or total [≥]90 supply days within the first year, excluding the initial 30 days) between 01/01/2000-31/12/2020. Main outcome measuresPropensity-score matched (1:5) cohorts of L-TOT discontinuers and L-TOT users were created to assess the association between L-TOT discontinuation and opioid-related death, hospitalisations due to bone fractures, their composite and all-cause mortality, using adjusted Cox regression models. If proportional hazards assumptions were violated, time-dependent Cox models were applied. ResultsA total of 29,589 L-TOT discontinuers (female 60.04%, mean age 56.45{+/-}18.42 years) were identified and matched with L-TOT users. The median follow-up durations were 6.87 years (interquartile range: 3.32 to 11.51) for opioid-related death in L-TOT discontinuers, compared to 5.74 years (2.51 to 10.18) in L-TOT users. Similar follow-up durations were observed for hospitalisations due to bone fractures, the composite outcome, and all-cause mortality. After adjusting for covariates used in the propensity score models, L-TOT discontinuation was associated with a 37% reduced risk in opioid-related death (adjusted hazards ratio: 0.63, 95% confidence interval: 0.42 to 0.94), a 5% reduction in the risk of hospitalisations due to bone fractures (0.95, 0.91 to 0.99), a 7% reduced risk of the composite outcome (0.93, 0.87 to 0.97), and a 22% lower risk of all-cause mortality (0.78, 0.76 to 0.80). ConclusionsL-TOT discontinuation was associated with reduced risks of opioid-related death, hospitalisations due to bone fractures and all-cause mortality, suggesting important safety benefits of this practice. Further research should assess broader health outcomes beyond those examined in this study. What is already known on this topicO_LIDespite safety and effectiveness concerns, a significant proportion of people (12.2%) in UK primary care rely on L-TOT to manage their CNCP. C_LIO_LIUK clinical guidelines recommend reducing or stopping L-TOT when potential harms outweigh the benefits. C_LIO_LIPrevious studies, primarily from the US, have shown mixed outcomes of L-TOT discontinuation, with some reporting positive effects such as reduced pain severity, while others highlighting significant risks including increased risks of suicide, overdose, and mental health crises. C_LI What this study addsO_LIOur study found that in UK primary care, patients with CNCP who discontinued L-TOT had a 37% lower risk of opioid-related death, a 5% reduced risk of hospitalisations due to bone fractures, and a 22% lower risk of all-cause mortality. C_LIO_LIOur findings support research into transitioning from L-TOT to alternative non-opioid pain management strategies, as no significant risks of adverse outcomes were observed with discontinuation. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors associated with long-term opioid therapy discontinuation for people with chronic non-cancer pain in UK primary care: a population-based retrospective cohort study 94%
- Effect of Telemedicine Support for Intraoperative Anaesthesia Care on Postoperative Outcomes: The TECTONICS Randomised Clinical Trial 88%
- The impact of female sex on anaesthetic awareness, depth and emergence: A systematic review and meta-analysis 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in analgesia prescribing in primary care in Ireland and England between 2014 and 2022 - a repeated cross-sectional study 91%
- Dexamethasone use and Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019: a Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study 91%
- People exposed to proton pump inhibitors shortly preceding COVID-19 diagnosis are not at an increased risk of subsequent hospitalizations and mortality: a nation-wide matched cohort study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends and variation in unsafe prescribing of methotrexate: a cohort study in English NHS primary care. 91%
- Colchicine for COVID-19 in adults in the community (PRINCIPLE): a randomised, controlled, adaptive platform trial 90%
- Antipsychotic management in general practice: serial cross-sectional study (2011-2020) 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patterns of analgesic prescribing and high-risk prescribing in primary care in Ireland 2014-2022 – a repeated cross-sectional study 95%
- Study Protocol: Prognostic Factors of High Healthcare Utilization Costs Among People with Spinal Disorders Using a Spine Registry Linked to Public Healthcare Data 89%
- Advancing the prediction and understanding of placebo responses in chronic back pain using large language models 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acute Pain Pathways: protocol for a prospective cohort study 93%
- A text messaging intervention to support patients with chronic pain during prescription opioid tapering: protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial 92%
- The Antidepressant Advisor (ADeSS): A Decision Support System for Antidepressant Treatment for Depression in UK primary care – a feasibility study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.