Back

A structure-guided approach to non-coding variant evaluation for transcription factor binding using AlphaFold 3

Gerasimavicius, L.; Biddie, S. C.; Marsh, J. A.

2025-03-20 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.03.20.644433 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Non-coding single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) that alter transcription factor (TF) binding can affect gene expression and contribute to disease. Sequence-based methods can excel at predicting TF binding, but rely on training data and can exhibit TF-specific biases. Here we propose a structure-guided approach for non-coding SNVs, using AlphaFold 3 (AF3) to model TF-DNA complexes and FoldX for downstream physics-based assessment. Benchmarked against SNP-SELEX data for six TFs (SPIB, ELK3, ETV4, SF-1, PAX5 and MEIS2), the FoldX-based strategy showed good agreement with experimental allele preferences. Interestingly, differences in AF3s interface predicted template modelling (ipTM) score aligned even more closely with SNP-SELEX results, generally surpassing energy-based metrics. Application to known disease-associated variants recapitulated most reported effects for TFs including NKX2-5, GATA3 and USF2A-USF1. In these examples, considering both {Delta}ipTM and FoldX energies proved more reliable than either metric alone. While less accurate than state-of-the-art sequence-based methods, this work demonstrates that structural modelling can yield interpretable insights into how non-coding variants influence TF binding. By highlighting both the promise and limitations of AF3 in this context, our study provides a framework for complementary structural evaluation of regulatory variants.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.