Back

Substrate viscoelasticity regulates fibroblast adhesion and migration

Paddillaya, N.; Rao, A.; Shrivastava, A.; Jamir, I.; Sengupta, K.; Gundiah, N.

2025-03-25 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.03.20.644304 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM) modulate cell-substrate interactions and influence cellular behaviors such as contractility, migrations, and proliferation. Although the effects of substrate stiffness on mechanobiology have been well studied, the role of ECM viscoelasticity in fibrotic progression remains less understood. To examine how viscoelasticity affects the biophysical properties and regulates the signaling of human mammary fibroblasts, we engineered elastic (E) and viscoelastic (VE) polyacrylamide hydrogels with comparable storage moduli ([~]14.52 {+/-} 1.03 kPa) but distinctly different loss moduli. Fibroblasts cultured on E hydrogels spread extensively (2428.93 {+/-} 864.71 m{superscript 2}), developed prominent stress fibers with higher zyxin intensity, and generated higher traction stresses (2931.57 {+/-} 1732.61 Pa). In contrast, fibroblasts on VE substrates formed smaller focal adhesion areas (54.2% reduction), exhibited lower critical adhesion strengths (51.8%), and generated 21% lower traction stresses (p < 0.001), indicating weaker adhesions. These substrates also promoted migrations and showed enhanced proliferation accompanied by reduced YAP activity, suggesting a mechanotransduction shift that may involve alternative signaling pathways. In contrast, E substrates showed YAP nuclear translocation, consistent with greater cytoskeletal tension and contractility. These findings highlight the importance of energy dissipation mechanisms in regulating fibroblast function on substrates mimicking the fibrotic milieu. Our results demonstrate that tuning the ECM viscoelasticity is a useful strategy to regulate cell behaviors in tissue engineered scaffolds, and develop better disease modeling for regenerative medicine.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.2%
2
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
3
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
4
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
6
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
8
Tissue Engineering Part A
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
9
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
10
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
12
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
15
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
18
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
24
Integrative Biology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
25
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%