Impact of Rare and Common Genetic Variation on Cell Type-Specific Gene Expression
Cuomo, A. S.; Spenceley, E.; Tanudisastro, H. A.; Bowen, B.; Henry, A.; Huang, H. L.; Xue, A.; Zhou, W.; Welland, M. J.; Lee, A. S.; Wing, K.; Tang, O.; Gray, M. P.; Franklin, M.; Harper, M.; Silk, M.; Bobowik, K.; Stuckey, A.; Marshall, J.; Bakiris, V.; Uren, C.; Swapna Madala, B.; Miniter, A.; Bartie, C.; Neavin, D. R.; Qiao, Z.; Ben-David, E.; Chen, L.; Kai-How Farh, K.; Grieve, S. M.; Nguyen, T.; Piscionere, J.; Siggs, O. M.; Nicholas, H.; de Lange, K. M.; Hewitt, A. W.; Figtree, G. A.; MacArthur, D. G.; Powell, J. E.
Show abstract
Understanding the genetic basis of gene expression can shed light on the regulatory mechanisms underlying complex traits and diseases. Single cell-resolved measures of RNA levels and single-cell expression quantitative trait loci (sc-eQTLs) have revealed genetic regulation that drives sub-tissue cell states and types across diverse human tissues. Here, we describe the first phase of TenK10K, the largest-to-date dataset of matched whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq). We leverage scRNA-seq data from over 5 million cells across 28 immune cell types, and matched WGS, from 1,925 individuals, which provides power to detect associations between rare and low-frequency genetic variants that have largely been uncharacterised in their impact on cell-specific gene expression. We map the effects of both common and rare variants in a cell type-specific manner using a recently introduced method that increases power by modelling single cells directly rather than relying on aggregated pseudobulk counts. We identify putative common regulatory variants for 83% of all 21,404 genes tested and cumulative rare variant signals for 47% of genes. We explore how genetic effects vary across cell type and state spectra, develop a framework to determine the degree to which sc-eQTLs are cell type-specific, and show that about half of the effects are observed only in one or a few cell types. By integrating our results with functional annotations and disease information, we also further characterise the likely molecular modes of action for many disease-variant associations. Finally, we explore the effects that genetic variants have on gene expression across continuous cell states and functions, and effects that vary cell state abundance directly.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic assessment of regulatory effects of human disease variants in pluripotent cells 98%
- Prioritization of autoimmune disease-associated genetic variants that perturb regulatory element activity in T cells 98%
- Tissue-specific enhancer-gene maps from multimodal single-cell data identify causal disease alleles 98%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of disease-associated chromatin accessibility QTLs across immune cell types and contexts 99%
- Colocalization of blood cell traits GWAS associations and variation in PU.1 genomic occupancy prioritizes causal noncoding regulatory variants 98%
- SNP-to-gene linking strategies reveal contributions of enhancer-related and candidate master-regulator genes to autoimmune disease 98%
Similar papers in this journal
- Shared and distinct molecular effects of regulatory genetic variants provide insight into mechanisms of distal enhancer-promoter communication 98%
- Single-cell genomics improves the discovery of risk variants and genes of Atrial Fibrillation 97%
- Unveiling causal regulatory mechanisms through cell-state parallax 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- A genome-wide mutational constraint map quantified from variation in 76,156 human genomes 97%
- Mapping the human genetic architecture of COVID-19 by worldwide meta-analysis 97%
- A human DNA methylation atlas reveals principles of cell type-specific methylation and identifies thousands of cell type-specific regulatory elements 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.