Decoding the causal drivers of spatial cellular topology
Shankar, P.; Liang, H.; Chitra, U.; Singh, R.
Show abstract
Decoding how cells influence and communicate with each other in space is fundamental for understanding tissue organization. However, existing approaches either overlook spatial context entirely or rely solely on local cell-cell adjacency, failing to capture how global tissue topology shapes cellular communication. Here, we present GLACIER, which introduces spatial Granger causality to infer transcriptional and signaling relationships that emerge from tissue organization. By combining GASTONs global isodepth coordinate with Veloramas graph-based causal inference framework, we enable bidirectional inference of regulatory relationships along spatial axes, identifying transcription factortarget interactions and ligand-receptor pairs that operate across spatial domains. Applying GLACIER to single-cell spatial transcriptomics data from the mouse cerebellum, we identify both continuous within-cell-type regulatory gradients and discontinuous drivers at layer interfaces, while distinguishing between forward and backward cellular communication along the isodepth axis. Our approach reveals how tissue architecture directs patterns of cellular communication, providing a framework for understanding spatially-encoded regulatory programs. Software availabilityhttps://github.com/rohitsinghlab/glacier.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- CellScope: High-Performance Cell Atlas Workflow with Tree-Structured Representation 95%
- STANCE: a unified statistical model to detect cell-type-specific spatially variable genes in spatial transcriptomics 95%
- FastCCC: A permutation-free framework for scalable, robust, and reference-based cell-cell communication analysis in single cell transcriptomics studies 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.