Back

Towards a unified molecular mechanism for ligand-dependent activation of NR4A-RXR heterodimers

Yu, X.; He, Y.; Kamenecka, T. M.; Kojetin, D. J.

2025-03-19 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.03.19.642122 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A subset of nuclear receptors (NRs) function as permissive heterodimers with retinoid X receptor (RXR), defined by transcriptional activation in response to binding RXR agonist ligands. Permissive NR-RXR activation operates via a classical pharmacological mechanism, where binding of an RXR agonist increases coactivator recruitment to the heterodimer. However, we previously demonstrated that transcriptional activation of permissive Nurr1-RXR (NR4A2-NR2B1) heterodimers by an RXR ligand set, which included pharmacological RXR agonists and selective Nurr1-RXR agonists that function as antagonists of RXR homodimers, occurs via a non-classical mechanism: ligand-binding domain (LBD) heterodimer dissociation (Yu et al., 2023). Here, we extend mechanistic ligand profiling of the same RXR ligand set to Nur77-RXR{gamma} (NR4A1-NR2B3), which is evolutionarily related to Nurr1-RXR. Biochemical and NMR protein-protein interaction profiling along with cellular transcription studies indicate that the RXR ligand set, which lacks selective Nur77-RXR{gamma} agonists, may influence Nur77-RXR{gamma} transcriptional activation through both classical pharmacological activation and LBD heterodimer dissociation. However, upon reanalyzing our previously published data for Nurr1-RXR, we found that the inclusion of selective Nurr1-RXR agonists was essential for elucidating the LBD heterodimer dissociation mechanism. Our findings underscore the need for a more functionally diverse RXR ligand set to explore Nur77-RXR{gamma} activation and unify LBD heterodimer dissociation as a potential targeting mechanism for NR4A-RXR heterodimers in neurodegenerative and inflammatory diseases.

Published in eLife (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.