Back

Application of Landmark Analysis and Piecewise Cox Regression to Identify Features Associated with Prognosis: A National Retrospective Cohort Study of New Zealand Women

Woodhouse, B.; Laux, W.; Trevarton, A.; Lasham, A.; Knowlton, N.

2025-03-20 oncology
10.1101/2025.03.18.25324230 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundBreast cancer prognosis changes over time in complex ways depending on individual risk factors. This study aimed to analyze how breast cancer outcomes in New Zealand women change over time and identify features associated with breast cancer specific survival and locoregional recurrence across different receptor subtypes. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from Te R[e]hita Mate [U]taetae (Breast Cancer Foundation National Register) on 21,574 women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 2000-2019. We applied k-medians survival clustering, landmark analysis, and piecewise Cox regression to identify time-specific risk patterns and prognostic features. ResultsSurvival improved significantly for women diagnosed more recently. Triple-negative breast cancer had the poorest 5-year breast cancer specific survival but demonstrated better outcomes for women surviving beyond this period. In contrast, ER+/HER2-tumors, associated with favorable short-term outcomes, showed the highest risk of late recurrence and breast cancer mortality beyond 10 years. Younger age at diagnosis ([≤]44 years) was associated with increased recurrence risks, especially for ER-/HER2+ tumors. Radiation therapy reduced early LRR across subtypes. Tumor grade was inversely associated with late recurrence, while stage 2 disease in ER+ tumors markedly elevated late recurrence odds compared to stage 1. ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the dynamic nature of breast cancer prognosis, with key findings emphasizing the time-dependent shifts in risk across receptor subtypes. These findings underscore the importance of personalized, receptor-specific follow-up strategies, including extended monitoring for subgroups at heightened long-term risk.

Published in Cancer Treatment and Research Communications · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.3%
2
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
3
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.4%
5
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
6
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.2%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.1%
9
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.6%
11
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
13
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
14
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
21
Molecular Oncology
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%