Back

Application of Landmark Analysis and Piecewise Cox Regression to Identify Features Associated with Prognosis: A National Retrospective Cohort Study of New Zealand Women

Woodhouse, B.; Laux, W.; Trevarton, A.; Lasham, A.; Knowlton, N.

2025-03-20 oncology
10.1101/2025.03.18.25324230
Show abstract

BackgroundBreast cancer prognosis changes over time in complex ways depending on individual risk factors. This study aimed to analyze how breast cancer outcomes in New Zealand women change over time and identify features associated with breast cancer specific survival and locoregional recurrence across different receptor subtypes. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from Te R[e]hita Mate [U]taetae (Breast Cancer Foundation National Register) on 21,574 women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 2000-2019. We applied k-medians survival clustering, landmark analysis, and piecewise Cox regression to identify time-specific risk patterns and prognostic features. ResultsSurvival improved significantly for women diagnosed more recently. Triple-negative breast cancer had the poorest 5-year breast cancer specific survival but demonstrated better outcomes for women surviving beyond this period. In contrast, ER+/HER2-tumors, associated with favorable short-term outcomes, showed the highest risk of late recurrence and breast cancer mortality beyond 10 years. Younger age at diagnosis ([≤]44 years) was associated with increased recurrence risks, especially for ER-/HER2+ tumors. Radiation therapy reduced early LRR across subtypes. Tumor grade was inversely associated with late recurrence, while stage 2 disease in ER+ tumors markedly elevated late recurrence odds compared to stage 1. ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the dynamic nature of breast cancer prognosis, with key findings emphasizing the time-dependent shifts in risk across receptor subtypes. These findings underscore the importance of personalized, receptor-specific follow-up strategies, including extended monitoring for subgroups at heightened long-term risk.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Breast Cancer Research
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 51%
10.0%
3
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 2%
7.5%
4
British Journal of Cancer
based on 22 papers
Top 0.5%
6.3%
5
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 13%
6.3%
6
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 5%
4.6%
7
Clinical Cancer Research
based on 22 papers
Top 1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 25%
4.4%
9
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
based on 14 papers
Top 0.7%
2.9%
10
International Journal of Cancer
based on 18 papers
Top 0.6%
2.8%
11
Cancer Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 1%
2.8%
12
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
based on 14 papers
Top 1.0%
2.8%
13
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 8%
2.4%
14
BMC Cancer
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
2.4%
15
Frontiers in Oncology
based on 34 papers
Top 4%
2.4%
16
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
based on 13 papers
Top 1%
2.3%
17
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 66%
2.2%
18
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
based on 13 papers
Top 0.9%
1.7%
19
Radiotherapy and Oncology
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
20
JCO Precision Oncology
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
21
BMC Research Notes
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
1.2%
22
npj Precision Oncology
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
23
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 10%
0.8%
24
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 10%
0.7%