Determinants of Qigong, Tai Chi, and Yoga Use for Health Conditions: A Systematic Review Protocol
Wexler, R. S.; Joyce, C.; Reichman, R.; Pereira, C.; Fanuele, E.; Hurstak, E.; Laird, L.; Lavretsky, H.; Wang, C.; Saper, R.; Alcorn, K.; Mittman, B. S.; Roseen, E. J.
Show abstract
INTRODUCTIONMind-body movement interventions such as qi gong, tai chi, and yoga are recommended in clinical practice guidelines to improve outcomes for several health conditions. However, use of these interventions for health conditions, or the integration of these interventions within healthcare settings, is low. A systematic synthesis of implementation determinants (i.e., barriers and facilitators) is needed to increase adoption. Similarly, determinants may influence other implementation outcomes, such as scalability or sustainability of these interventions in a healthcare system or community organization. Thus, in conducting this review we aim to identify determinants of qi gong, tai chi, and yoga use for health conditions. The secondary aim is to evaluate whether barriers and facilitators differ by intervention type, health condition, implementation setting, or implementation outcome. METHODS AND ANALYSISWe conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycInfo) through May 2024 and a grey literature search (Google Scholar, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO Clinical Trials database) through March 2025. We will include original research articles in English that identify barriers and facilitators to adoption of qi gong, tai chi, and yoga by adults with health conditions. Study quality will be assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We will code each article using a codebook informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), a comprehensive taxonomy of implementation determinants. Findings will be presented as a narrative synthesis. We will report on how barriers and facilitators may relate to intervention type (qi gong, tai chi, yoga), health condition (e.g., low back pain, fall prevention), implementation settings (e.g., primary care clinic, community organization) or implementation outcome (e.g., adoption, sustainability). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATIONEthics approval will not be obtained for this review of published, publicly accessible data. The results from this systematic review will be disseminated through conference presentations and journal publications. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDYO_LIThere are no prior comprehensive reviews of the determinants (i.e., barriers and facilitators) of qi gong, tai chi and yoga use. This review will examine whether barriers and/or facilitators vary by type of mind-body movement intervention, health condition, implementation setting, or implementation outcome. C_LIO_LIOur search has been guided by librarians with expertise in systematic review methodology and informed by the PEER Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS) guidelines. Reporting of results will be informed by the PRISMA-P checklist for systematic reviews. C_LIO_LIWe will use the updated version of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR, version 2.0) to report implementation factors using consistent concepts to facilitate use of the review by researchers, healthcare systems, and community organizations. Our findings will support the development of implementation strategies to increase the adoption of qi gong, tai chi, and yoga for health conditions. C_LIO_LIDue to the complex nature of describing implementation determinants and characterizing them within the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, our review is limited to papers written in English which may restrict the generalizability of our implementation findings to predominantly English-speaking healthcare settings. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Community-Based Culturally Tailored Education Programs for Black Adults with Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, Hypertension, and Stroke: A Systematic Review Protocol 95%
- Barriers and facilitators to implementing core osteoarthritis treatments in China: a mixed-method study 94%
- The devil is in the details: Reporting and transparent research practices in sports medicine and orthopedic clinical trials 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence-Based, Cost-Effective Interventions To Suppress The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 93%
- Community mobilisation approaches to preventing and reducing adolescent multiple risk behaviour: a realist review protocol 91%
- Is artificial intelligence for medical professionals serving the patients? Protocol for a mixed method systematic review on patient-relevant benefits and harms of algorithmic decision-making 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceived facilitators and barriers among physical therapists and orthopedic surgeons to pre-operative home-based exercise with one exercise-only in patients with severe knee osteoarthritis: A qualitative interview study nested in the QUADX-1 trial 94%
- Supervised and self-directed technology-based dual-task exercise training programme for older adults at risk of falling – Protocol for a feasibility study 94%
- Menopause education of healthcare professionals: A scoping review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 92%
- A protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial of guided self-help Behavioral Activation intervention for geriatric depression 92%
- The Womens Wellness After Giving Birth Program (WWAGBP) for Vietnamese women: A single-arm trial protocol 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And DEcision Making (MyComrade) study: A protocol for a cross-border pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 92%
- Implementation of an internet-based stress management program in micro- and small-sized enterprises: A study protocol for a pre-post feasibility study of the effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 2 trial 92%
- Real-time Auditory Feedback for Improving Gait and Walking in People with Parkinson’s Disease: A Pilot and Feasibility Trial 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.