Multimodal MRI Marker of Cognition Explains the Association Between Cognition and Mental Health in UK Biobank
Buianova, I.; Silvestrin, M.; Deng, J.; Pat, N.
Show abstract
BackgroundCognitive dysfunction often co-occurs with psychopathology. Advances in neuroimaging and machine learning have led to neural indicators that predict individual differences in cognition with reasonable performance. We examined whether these neural indicators explain the relationship between cognition and mental health in the UK Biobank cohort (n > 14000). MethodsUsing machine learning, we quantified the covariation between general cognition and 133 mental health indices and derived neural indicators of cognition from 72 neuroimaging phenotypes across diffusion-weighted MRI (dwMRI), resting-state functional MRI (rsMRI), and structural MRI (sMRI). With commonality analyses, we investigated how much of the cognition-mental health covariation is captured by each neural indicator and neural indicators combined within and across MRI modalities. ResultsThe predictive association between mental health and cognition was at out-of-sample r = 0.3. Neuroimaging phenotypes captured 2.1% to 25.8% of the cognition-mental health covariation. The highest proportion of variance explained by dwMRI was attributed to the number of streamlines connecting cortical regions (19.3%), by rsMRI through functional connectivity between 55 large-scale networks (25.8%), and by sMRI via the volumetric characteristics of subcortical structures (21.8%). Combining neuroimaging phenotypes within modalities improved the explanation to 25.5% for dwMRI, 29.8% for rsMRI, and 31.6% for sMRI, and combining them across all MRI modalities enhanced the explanation to 48%. ConclusionsWe present an integrated approach to derive multimodal MRI markers of cognition that can be transdiagnostically linked to psychopathology. This demonstrates that the predictive ability of neural indicators extends beyond the prediction of cognition itself, enabling us to capture the cognition-mental health covariation.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Manifold learning uncovers nonlinear interactions between the adolescent brain and environment that predict emotional and behavioral problems 94%
- Longitudinal changes in infant attention-related brain networks and fearful temperament 94%
- Default Mode Network Hypoalignment of Function to Structure Correlates with Depression and Rumination 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A thalamo-centric neural signature for restructuring negative self-beliefs 95%
- ADHD symptoms map onto noise-driven structure-function decoupling between hub and peripheral brain regions 94%
- Deciphering the Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Brain Structure: Insights from Mendelian Randomization 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatial patterning of tissue volume loss in schizophrenia reflects brain network architecture 95%
- Predicting cognitive and mental health traits and their polygenic architecture using large-scale brain connectomics 93%
- Glutamate and Dysconnection in the Salience Network: Neurochemical, Effective-connectivity, and Computational Evidence in Schizophrenia 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Large-Scale Structural and Functional Connectome of Social Mentalizing 95%
- State and trait characteristics of anterior insula time-varying functional connectivity 94%
- Diffusion time-related structure-function coupling reveals differential association with inter-individual variations in body mass index 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.