Unraveling Metabolic Signatures in Breast Cancer: Machine Learning for Improved Therapeutic Targeting
Mehdikhani, F.; Habibi, P.; Alavimanesh, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundBreast cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide. Despite advancements in treatment, therapeutic resistance remains a major challenge, necessitating novel approaches for more effective interventions. One of the hallmarks of cancer, particularly in breast tumors, is metabolic reprogramming, where altered metabolic pathways create distinct profiles compared to normal cells. Identifying these metabolic alterations can provide critical insights for developing targeted therapies aimed at disrupting tumor metabolism and improving patient outcomes. ObjectivesThis study applies six machine learning algorithms to predict metabolic profiles in breast cancer patients compared to healthy individuals, providing a promising approach for identifying metabolic targets in precision therapy. MethodPlasma samples from 102 breast cancer patients and 99 healthy individuals were analyzed using targeted liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to assess metabolic profiles. Six machine learning algorithms were applied to evaluate classification performance, and feature importance was determined using the Mean Squared Error (MSE) value. ResultOur findings revealed a significant decrease in alanine, histidine, tryptophan, tyrosine, methionine, and proline levels in breast cancer patients. Among the machine learning models, Random Forest (RF) achieved the highest classification performance (accuracy: 0.90, specificity: 0.85, sensitivity: 0.95), followed by K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) with similar sensitivity but lower specificity. Logistic Regression (LR) balanced specificity (0.90) and sensitivity (0.86) with an accuracy of 0.88. Naive Bayes (NB) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) showed moderate accuracy (0.83), while Decision Tree (DT) had the lowest sensitivity (0.76) but the highest PPV (0.89). Feature importance analysis identified glutamic acid, ketocholesterol, cystine, ornithine, succinate, acetylcarnitine, asparagine, tryptophan, and palmitic acid as key metabolic markers. ConclusionThis study draws attention to key predictive metabolic bottlenecks identified through machine learning models, which could aid in targeted therapy and personalized treatment based on patients metabolic profiles.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Accurate Screening for Early-Stage Breast Cancer by Detection and Profiling of Circulating Tumor Cells 94%
- The differential metabolic signature of breast cancer cellular response to olaparib treatment 94%
- From Variability to Standardization: The Impact of Breast Density on Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and the Need for a Structured Reporting System 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact of Variance in Carnitine Palmitoyltransferase-1 Expression on Breast Cancer Prognosis is Stratified by Clinical and Anthropometric Factors 95%
- The inhibitory effects of butein on cell proliferation and TNF-α-induced CCL2 release in racially different triple negative breast cancer cells 94%
- The Effect of a Ketogenic Diet and Synergy with Rapamycin in a Mouse Model of Breast Cancer. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrative Analysis of Metabolomic and Transcriptomic Profiles Uncovers Biological Mechanism of Feed Efficiency in Pigs 92%
- Identification and characterization of metabolic subtypes of endometrial cancer using systems-level approach 92%
- Matrix Linear Models for connecting metabolite composition to individual characteristics 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving prognosis of surrogate assay for breast cancer patients by absolute quantitation of Ki67 protein levels using Quantitative Dot Blot (QDB) method 94%
- Absence of Glutathione S-Transferase Theta 1 Gene is Significantly Associated with Breast Cancer Susceptibility in Pakistani Population and Poor Overall Survival in Breast Cancer Patients: A Case-Control and Case Series Analysis 93%
- Metabolomic markers of colorectal tumor with different clinicopathological features 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The NILS study protocol - a retrospective validation study of a preoperative decision-making tool for non-invasive lymph node staging in women with primary breast cancer [ISRCTN14341750] 93%
- A Machine Learning Ensemble Based on Radiomics to Predict BI-RADS Category and Reduce the Biopsy Rate of Ultrasound-Detected Suspicious Breast Masses 92%
- Analytical performance of a highly sensitive system to detect gene variants using next-generation sequencing for lung cancer companion diagnostics 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.