Back

Accumbal cholinergic interneurons regulate decision making or motor impulsivity depending on latent task state

Hynes, T.; Chernoff, C. S.; Hrelja, K.; Li, A.; Betts, G.; Calderhead, L.; Winstanley, C.

2025-03-17 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2025.03.17.643719 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Dopaminergic transmission within the nucleus accumbens is broadly implicated in risk/reward decision making and impulse control, and the rat gambling task (rGT) measures both behaviours concurrently. While the resulting indices of risky choice and impulsivity correlate at the population level, dopaminergic manipulations rarely impact both behaviours uniformly, with changes in choice more likely when dopaminergic transmission is altered during task acquisition. Although the task structure of the rGT remains constant, the importance of accumbal dopamine signals relevant for reward prediction versus impulse control may vary over time; the former should dominate while learning which option maximises sugar pellet profits, while the suppression of premature responses becomes more valuable once a decision-making strategy is set and can be exploited. Cholinergic interneurons (CINs) critically control dopamine release within the striatum, and can also encode latent task states deciphered by the frontal cortex. We theorised that aCINs may set the dopaminergic tone of the accumbens to maximise reward learning or impulse control during task acquisition or performance, respectively. Using chemogenetics, we found some support for this hypothesis: activation and inhibition of aCINs once behaviour was stable increased and decreased motor impulsivity in both sexes but had no effect on choice patterns. In contrast, activating and inhibiting aCINs throughout task acquisition did not alter motor impulsivity, but decreased and increased risky choice respectively. However, the former effect was only seen in males and the latter in females. We conclude by proposing a set of testable predictions regarding interactions between acetylcholine and dopamine that could explain these sex differences.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
18.5%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.4%
3
Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
4
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.3%
5
Psychopharmacology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
8
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
9
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
10
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 26%
2.3%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.9%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
14
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
15
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
16
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
18
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
20
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
24
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
27
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.6%
28
Learning & Memory
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%