Transcranial electrical stimulation for memory enhancement: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Goto, Y.; Onagawa, R.; Takemi, M.; Ishikawa, K.; Narukawa, S.; Amano, K.; Hosomi, K.
Show abstract
BackgroundNon-invasive brain stimulation techniques have received increasing interest for their potential to enhance memory function, a fundamental cognitive aspect of daily life. MethodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the efficacy of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) in enhancing memory function in healthy adults, following the pre-registered strategy at PROSPERO (CRD42022353630). ResultsA total of 66 articles (119 trials, 3,786 participants) focusing on transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial alternating current stimulation were identified. Meta-analysis revealed a significant overall effect of tES on memory function compared with sham stimulation (standardized mean difference [95% confidence interval] = 0.19 [0.12-0.27]), with anodal transcranial direct current stimulation showing the most consistent enhancement. In particular, stimulation of the frontal regions effectively improved working and declarative memories. While the effects remained significant within hours post-stimulation, they diminished after one day or longer. Regarding adverse events, tingling and itching sensations on the scalp occurred more frequently in the active group than in the sham group, but no severe adverse events were reported. Challenges, including publication bias, heterogeneity, and bias toward specific aspects of memory were noted, emphasizing the need for improved experimental rigor and diversification of memory tasks. ConclusionThese findings highlight the potential of tES as a safe and effective tool for memory enhancement while emphasizing areas for future research to develop its applications.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Transferability of cathodal tDCS effects from the primary motor to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a multimodal TMS-EEG study 95%
- Human Applications of Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation: A Systematic Review 94%
- An in vivo model for transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex in awake mice. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying regions in prefrontal cortex related to working memory improvement: a novel meta-analytic method using electric field modeling 96%
- From Feasibility to Utility: A Meta-Analysis of Amygdala-Neurofeedback 89%
- The central autonomic system revisited - convergent evidence for a regulatory role of the insular and midcingulate cortex from neuroimaging meta-analyses 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Retrieval Capacity of the Predictive Brain through Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Intervention 93%
- Stimulating prefrontal cortex facilitates training transfer by increasing representational overlap 92%
- Causal relationship between the right auditory cortex and speech-evoked envelope-following response: Evidence from combined tDCS and EEG 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards individualized deep brain stimulation: A stereoelectroencephalography-based workflow for neurostimulation target identification 91%
- Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation enhances emotional bias towards happiness in healthy young adults: A comparative study of electrical and ultrasound stimulation 91%
- Towards optimization of oscillatory stimulation during sleep 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Failure to modulate reward prediction errors in declarative learning with theta (6 Hz) frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation. 93%
- Feasibility of Remotely Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Cognitive Remediation: A Systematic Review 92%
- Repeated noninvasive stimulation of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex reveals cumulative amplification of pleasant compared to unpleasant scene processing: a single subject pilot study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.