Back

Quantification of collagen and associated features from H&E-stained whole slide pathology images across cancer types using a physics-based deep learning model

Nguyen, T. H.; Zhang, J.; Hipp, J.; Chhor, G.; Griffin, M.; Le, N.; Kartik, D.; Zhang, Y.; Mirzadeh, M.; Varao, J.; Allay, J.; Sweeney, M.; Rivera, V.; Johnson, B.; Brosnan-Cashman, J. A.; Bronnimann, M.; Pokkalla, H.; Glass, B.; Beck, A. H.; Lee, J.; Egger, R.

2025-03-17 pathology
10.1101/2025.03.17.643273 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCollagen is the major component of the extracellular matrix (ECM). Collagen structural organization undergoes significant transformation during tumorigenesis. The visualization of collagen in histological tissue sections would aid in the study of tumor growth, encapsulation, and invasion. However, such visualization requires the use of special stains such as Picrosirius Red (PSR) or Massons Trichrome (MT), or more recently, second-harmonic generation imaging (SHG) in unstained tissue sections. However, PSR and MT both suffer from significant inter- (and intra-) lab stain variabilities, and SHG, while considered a ground truth by many, suffers from issues of system complexity/reliability, cost, and speed/throughput. These technical hurdles limit more widespread assessment of collagen in tissue samples. MethodsUsing high-contrast, high-throughput polarization imaging on PSR-stained slides to generate ground truth training polarization images, we developed a deep learning model (iQMAI) to infer the presence of collagen directly from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole-slide images (WSIs) with high specificity. After iQMAI inference across WSIs, individual collagen fibers were extracted, and features describing overall collagen intensity and fiber morphology were computed. iQMAI pixel-and feature-wise outputs were compared to ground truth polarization imaging to assess model performance. The trained iQMAI model was deployed on H&E-stained WSI from the TCGA LUAD, LUSC, LIHC, and PAAD datasets for evaluation. iQMAI-derived collagen features were compared to tissue composition, gene expression, and overall survival. ResultsThe iQMAI model shows significant generalization across multiple indications. iQMAI collagen predictions were similar to polarization imaging measurements of the same sample, with a mean structural similarity index (SSIM) of 0.84 (95% CI 0.69-0.93), a mean patch-wise RMSE of 0.04 (95% CI 0.02-0.08), and a linear correlation (R2=0.93). Comparing features of the collagen fibers extracted from iQMAI vs. polarization images yielded similar linear correlations between computed fiber tortuosity, length, width, and relative angle. The relationship between collagen fiber density and fibroblast density was distinct in non-small cell lung cancer (LUAD and LUSC), hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC), and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PAAD). In PAAD, fiber density and fiber width were both negatively associated with the LRRC-15 gene expression signature, and increased fiber width was associated with longer overall survival. ConclusionsiQMAI is a deep learning model that accurately predicts collagen from an H&E-stained WSI, allowing for spatially resolved quantification of collagen morphology and enabling investigation of the interplay between collagen and other TME components. We demonstrate an example of the utility of iQMAI-based collagen assessment in PAAD, where collagen features are associated with immunosuppressive cancer-associated fibroblasts and overall survival. Understanding the relationship between collagen, the tumor microenvironment composition, and disease progression may aid the development of effective immunotherapies in PAAD and other cancer types.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Light: Science & Applications
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 15%
11.9%
3
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.5%
5
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
6
Journal of Pathology Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
7
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.2%
8
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
Advanced Intelligent Systems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
11
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
12
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 16%
2.1%
14
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
15
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Modern Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.5%
19
The American Journal of Pathology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
20
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
21
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
22
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
23
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.1%
24
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
26
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
28
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Skeletal Muscle
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
30
npj Imaging
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%