A parsimonious model for learning order relations provides a principled explanation of diverse experimental data
Yang, Y.; Maass, W.
Show abstract
Brains are able to extract diverse relations between objects or concepts, and to integrate relational information into cognitive maps that form a basis for decision making. But is has remained a mystery how relational information is learnt and represented by neural networks of the brain. We show that a simple synaptic plasticity rule enables neurons to absorb and represent relational information, and to use it for abstract inference. This inherent capability of neurons and synaptic plasticity is supported by a rigorous mathematical theory. It explains experimental data from the human brain on the emergence of cognitive maps after learning several linear orders, it explains the terminal item effect that enhances transitive inference if a terminal item of an order is involved, and it provides a simple model for fast configuration of internal order representations in the face of new evidence. We also present a rigorous theoretical explanation for the surprising fact that 2D projections of neural representations of linear orders are curved, rather than linear. Since our model does not require stochastic gradient descent in deep neural networks for learning order relations, it is suited for porting the capability to learn multiple relations and using them for fast inference into edge devices with a low energy budget.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Redundant representations are required to disambiguate simultaneously presented complex stimuli 97%
- Task-induced neural covariability as a signature of approximate Bayesian learning and inference 97%
- Learning compositional sequences with multiple time scales through a hierarchical network of spiking neurons 97%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.