Back

Biventricular Pressure-Volume Loop Analysis Predicts Outcomes After Double Switch Operation For Congenitally Corrected Transposition Of The Great Arteries with Intact Ventricular Septum

Thatte, N.; Hammer, P. E.; Marx, G. R.; Beroukhim, R. S.; Gauvreau, K.; Callahan, R.; Prakash, A.; Emani, S. M.; Hoganson, D. M.; del Nido, P. J.; Ghelani, S. J.

2025-03-18 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.03.17.25324148 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAssessing left ventricular (LV) preparedness in congenitally-corrected transposition of the great arteries/intact ventricular septum (ccTGA/IVS) prior to the double switch operation (DSO) remains challenging. Subpulmonary LV Pressure-Volume Area (PVA) - a comprehensive metric of ventricular workload - when compared to systemic right ventricular (RV) PVA as a benchmark, may be a good index of adequacy. AimsDetermine (1) if LV PVA can be estimated from simple catheterization and imaging parameters, using conductance-catheter derived PVA as reference, and (2) if LV:RV ePVA ratio predicts outcomes after DSO. MethodsSubpulmonary LV PVA was measured using conductance catheters and compared to estimated PVA (ePVA) calculated with simple catheterization and volumetric variables. Then, in a retrospective cohort, LV:RV ePVA ratio and other clinical variables were evaluated as predictors for a composite adverse outcome of [&ge;]moderate LV dysfunction, transplant, or death post-DSO. ResultsePVA yielded high agreement and low bias compared to measured PVA by conductance catheter (n=20). In the retrospective cohort, 6/42 patients (14%) experienced the outcome. Low LV:RV ePVA and pressure ratios were the only significant predictors, while LV mass and mass-to-volume ratio were not. Amongst 8 patients with borderline pressure ratios, ePVA ratio was an excellent discriminator - five with ePVA ratio <0.67 had adverse outcome, whereas three with ePVA ratio [&ge;]0.67 did not. ConclusionsEstimation of subpulmonary LV PVA using simple imaging and catheterization data was reliable compared to gold standard techniques. LV:RV ePVA ratio [&ge;]0.67 was a strong and novel predictor of LV preparedness for DSO in patients with ccTGA/IVS. Central MessageBiventricular pressure-volume area (PVA), a surrogate of myocardial [V]O2, can be estimated in ccTGA patients. LV:RV PVA ratio >0.67 is a novel marker of LV preparedness for double switch operation. Perspective StatementThe current approach for determining LV preparedness prior to double switch operation (DSO) is inadequate with a 15% rate of post-DSO LV dysfunction. Pressure-Volume Area (PVA) is a comprehensive yet concise metric incorporating both pressure and volume work. Use of LV:RV PVA ratio may improve patient selection and therefore outcomes after DSO in patients with ccTGA and intact ventricular septum.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.