Back

Uncovering functional deterioration in the rhizosphere microbiome associated with wheat dwarfing

Smith, M. E.; Kavamura, V. N.; Hughes, D.; Mendes, R.; Clark, I.; Mauchline, T.; Lund, G. A.

2025-03-17 microbiology
10.1101/2025.03.16.643510 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundOne of the biggest developments of wheat domestication was the development of semi-dwarf cultivars that respond well to fertilisers and produce higher yields without lodging. Consequently, this change has also impacted the wheat microbiome, often resulting in reduced selection of taxa and a loss of network complexity in the rhizospheres of semi-dwarf cultivars. Given the importance of rhizosphere microbiomes for plant health and performance, it is imperative that we understand if and how these changes have affected their function. Here, we use shotgun metagenomics to classify the functional potential of prokaryote communities from the rhizospheres of tall and semi-dwarf cultivars to compare the impact of wheat dwarfing on rhizosphere microbiome functions. ResultsWe found distinct taxonomic and functional differences between tall and semi-dwarf wheat rhizosphere communities and identified that semi-dwarf wheat microbiomes were less distinct from bulk soil communities. Of the 113 functional genes that were differentially abundant between tall and semi-dwarf cultivars, 95 % were depleted in semi-dwarf cultivars and 65 % of differentially abundant reads best mapped to genes involved in staurosporine biosynthesis (antibiotic product), plant cell wall degradation (microbial mediation of plant root architecture, overwintering energy source for microbes) and sphingolipid metabolism (signal bioactive molecules). ConclusionsOverall, our findings indicate that green revolution breeding has developed wheat cultivars with a reduced rhizosphere effect. The consequences of this are likely detrimental to the development of microbiome-assisted agriculture which will require a strong rhizosphere selective environment for the establishment of a beneficial plant root microbiome. We believe our results are of striking importance and highlight that implementation of microbiome facilitated agriculture as part of a sustainable crop production strategy will require an overhaul of wheat breeding programmes to consider plant-microbe interactions, especially in the root environment.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Phytobiomes Journal
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
2
Plant and Soil
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
3
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
4
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.2%
6
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
7
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
9
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
10
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
12
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
13
Environmental Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
14
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
15
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
16
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
17
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
19
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
20
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
21
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
23
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
24
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
25
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
FEMS Microbes
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
28
Environmental Microbiology Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
29
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.6%
30
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%