Effects of single synonymous substitutions on folding efficiency demonstrate the influence of rare codons and protein structure
Otsuka, F. A. M.; Andre, I.
Show abstract
Proteins can misfold during cotranslational folding, but how codon sequences influence this process is not well understood. Here, we develop an in vivo assay to comprehensively study the impact of single synonymous substitutions on protein folding efficiency and apply it to the N-terminal domain of E. Coli protein ddlA. We map the influence of codons along the sequence and demonstrate that codons can substantially influence the folding efficiency and that the impact depends on the structure and topology of the protein. A cluster of codons associated with residues in the center of the domain fold strongly influences the folding efficiency. Moreover, substitutions to rarer codons generally lead to increased folding efficiency. A mRNA sequence exclusively made up of rare codons results in higher expression than one with only common codons. Our results highlight the importance of rare codons in cotranslational folding and the relationship between codon sequence and protein structure.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ultradeep characterisation of translational sequence determinants refutes rare-codon hypothesis and unveils quadruplet base pairing of initiator tRNA and transcript 96%
- A modular RNA interference system for multiplexed gene regulation 96%
- Base composition at the start of the coding sequence controls the balance between translation initiation and mRNA degradation in E. coli . 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Epistasis between promoter activity and coding mutations shapes gene evolvability 95%
- Ultrafast pore-loop dynamics in a AAA+ machine point to a Brownian-ratchet mechanism for protein translocation 95%
- Dynamics of bacterial operons during genome-wide stresses is influenced by premature terminations and internal promoters 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.