Back

Efficacy and Safety of Prehospital Tranexamic Acid for Trauma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Bolarte-Arteaga, M.; Espinoza-Portilla, J.; Santa Cruz-De Lama, F.; Zavaleta-Corvera, C.

2025-03-17 surgery
10.1101/2025.03.15.25324013
Show abstract

BackgroundTrauma is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has shown effectiveness in reducing hemorrhage-related mortality in a hospital setting. However, its application in the prehospital setting still presents challenges. AimTo determine the efficacy and safety of TXA administered in the prehospital setting in trauma patients. MethodsA systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted. PRISMA guidelines were followed.Randomized clinical trials evaluating the administration of TXA in the prehospital setting in trauma patients aged 18 years or older were included. Studies were assessed by two reviewers independently. The GRADE approach was used to assess the quality of evidence and ROB2 to identify the risk of bias. Results were analyzed by meta-analysis, using fixed or random effects models, depending on the heterogeneity observed. ResultsA total of 979 records were identified; PubMed (149), Embase (565), Cochrane (29) and Scopus (236). Three studies were included. After analysis TXA reduced mortality in the first 24 hours (RR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.56-0.97; P = 0.03) and at 28 days (RR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.69-0.98; P = 0.03). No improvement in survival with favorable long-term functional outcome was observed (RR 1.11, 95% CI: 0.91-1.35; P = 0.29). No significant differences were found in adverse events such as deep vein thrombosis (RR 1.23, 95% CI: 0.96-1.58; P = 0.11), pulmonary embolism (RR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.76-1.53; P = 0.66) or myocardial infarction (RR 2.17, 95% CI: 0.75-6.31; P = 0.15). ConclusionsPrehospital TXA use in trauma patients reduces short-term mortality, mortality in the first 24 hours, and mortality at 28 days. In addition, it does not increase the risk of serious adverse events; deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke.

Matching journals

1
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 15%
1.8× avg
2
Systematic Reviews
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
#1
137× avg
3
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 0.4%
19× avg
4
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 0.5%
35× avg
5
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 22%
5.0%
6
BMC Neurology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.1%
60× avg
7
Journal of the American Heart Association
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 92 published papers
Top 6%
4.1× avg
8
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 99 published papers
Top 4%
4.7× avg
9
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 57%
2.7%
10
Trials
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 24 published papers
Top 1%
17× avg
11
Stroke
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 29 published papers
Top 2%
8.9× avg
12
Critical Care
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 14 published papers
Top 0.9%
18× avg
13
Journal of Neurotrauma
Mary Ann Liebert Inc · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.8%
21× avg
14
Emergency Medicine Journal
BMJ · based on 20 published papers
Top 1%
8.3× avg
15
Open Heart
BMJ · based on 18 published papers
Top 4%
7.7× avg
16
Heliyon
Elsevier BV · based on 57 published papers
Top 6%
4.1× avg
17
Critical Care Explorations
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 15 published papers
Top 1%
12× avg
18
Brain Communications
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 79 published papers
Top 6%
2.8× avg
19
npj Digital Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 85 published papers
Top 13%
0.7%