Network geometry shapes multi-task representational transformations across human cortex
Nallan Chakravarthula, L.; Ito, T.; Tzalavras, A.; Cole, M. W.
Show abstract
How the human brain performs such a wide variety of possible tasks remains an enigma. Recent work revealed that reduced dimensionality of task representations enables generalization across contexts, yet the mechanisms implementing such compression remain unclear. We hypothesized that network architecture constrains representational compression via low-dimensional region-to-region connectivity mappings. Notably, this contrasts with the common assumption that between-region connections passively carry information. We tested this using fMRI data from participants performing 16 diverse tasks and activity flow modeling, a data-driven neural network modeling approach. As hypothesized, connectivity dimensionality predicted cross-region representational changes: low-dimensional connectivity compressed task representations, while high-dimensional connectivity expanded them. Activity flow modeling demonstrated these connectivity patterns transform rather than passively transfer representations, producing compression-then-expansion from sensory through association to motor regions, enabling cross-task generalization and task-specific implementation. These findings reveal how intrinsic network geometry specifies representational transformations, providing systems-level insights into how network geometry enables flexible cognition.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Convergence of cortical types and functional motifs in the mesiotemporal lobe 96%
- Large-scale neural dynamics in a shared low-dimensional state space reflect cognitive and attentional dynamics 96%
- Transcriptomics-informed large-scale cortical model captures topography of pharmacological neuroimaging effects of LSD 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.