Back

Dissecting the effects of single amino acid substitutions in SARS-CoV2 Mpro

Sreenivasan, S.; Fontes, J.; Swint-Kruse, L.

2025-03-17 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.03.14.643358 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Successfully predicting the effects of amino acid substitutions on protein function and stability remains challenging. Recent efforts to improve computational models have included training and validation on high-throughput experimental datasets, such as those generated by deep mutational scanning (DMS) approaches. However, DMS signals typically conflate a substitutions effects on protein function with those on in vivo protein abundance; this limits the resolution of mechanistic insights that can be gleaned from DMS data. Distinguishing functional changes from abundance-related effects is particularly important for substitutions that exhibit intermediate outcomes (e.g., partial loss-of-function), which are difficult to predict. Here, we explored changes in in vivo abundance for substitutions at representative positions in the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease (Mpro). For this study, we used previously published DMS results to identify "rheostat" positions, which are defined by having substitutions that sample a broad range of intermediate outcomes. We generated 10 substitutions at each of six positions and separately measured effects on function and abundance. Results revealed an [~]45-fold range of change for abundance, demonstrating that it can make significant contributions to DMS outcomes. Moreover, the six tested positions showed diverse substitution sensitivities for function and abundance. Some positions influenced only one parameter. Others exhibited rheostatic effects on both parameters, which to our knowledge, provides the first example of such behavior. Since effects on function and abundance may arise through different biophysical bases, these results underscore the need for datasets that independently measure these parameters in order to build predictors with enhanced mechanistic insights. ABSTRACT for broader audienceChanging one amino acid in a protein can affect its function, its abundance, or both. Understanding these separate effects will help scientists predict how protein changes alter biology, which is important for understanding pathogen evolution, improving personalized medicine, and bioengineering. This work reports a study to experimentally separate these effects for the main protease of SARS-CoV-2 and suggests strategies for building better prediction models for emerging variants of this key viral protein.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.1%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.1%
3
Frontiers in Virology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
7
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
8
Biochemical Journal
80 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
13
ACS Infectious Diseases
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
14
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
16
Virology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
18
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
19
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
22
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%