Back

Great Ape Childhoods: Development of infant bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) in the wild

Vlaeyen, J. M. R.; van Boekholt, B.; Wegdell, F.; Katumba, R.; Berghaenel, A.; Surbeck, M.; Pika, S.

2025-03-15 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2025.03.14.643318 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Human development is marked by extended immaturity, necessitating extended care throughout infancy and childhood, facilitating advanced cognitive, social, and cultural skill acquisition. Parallels of extended development are also present in our closest living relatives, bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). The Self-Domestication Hypothesis (SDH) suggests that human uniqueness stems from selection against aggression. Bonobos are also considered self-domesticated, exhibiting lower aggression and greater social tolerance, which are linked to delayed development and prolonged maternal dependence compared to chimpanzees. However, systematic, quantitative comparisons of the two species developmental patterns are limited and conflicting. This study addressed this gap by examining behavioural development in bonobo and chimpanzee infants aged 0-5.5 years living in two populations (Kokolopori community, Kokolopori Bonobo Reserve, DRC, N=21; Ngogo community, Kibale National Park, Uganda, N=22) in their natural environments. We specifically focused on (i) general behaviours (travel, feeding, grooming), and (ii) spatial independence. By systematically comparing developmental data and using consistent methods, we tested whether bonobo development aligns with SDH predictions. Our results showed similar developmental trajectories, with no species differences concerning ventral riding, nipple contact, or grooming. However, we found species differences regarding travel and proximity patterns, with chimpanzees exhibiting prolonged dorsal riding, bonobos travelling independently more often and maintaining greater distances from their mothers. Age, sibling presence, and maternal parity influenced behavioural patterns, but no sex differences were observed. These findings challenge assumptions of slower bonobo maturation, and highlight the importance of systematic, collaborative research on primate behavioural diversity in natural environments.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.7%
2
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
3
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.4%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.1%
9
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
14
Behavioural Processes
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
15
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
16
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
17
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%