Back

Blocking IF3N delays bacterial translation initiation

Sanchez-Castro, A.; Penaranda, K.; Dallape, A.; Safdari, H.; Nakamoto, J. A.; Morici, M.; Vinogradova, D.; Paleskava, A.; Wilson, D.; Konevega, A. L.; Milon, P.

2025-03-16 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.03.14.643242 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bacterial translation initiation factor IF3 is composed of two distinct domains--a well-characterized C-terminal domain (IF3C), which enhances the speed and fidelity of translation initiation, and a less understood N-terminal domain (IF3N). In this study, we developed an aptamer (Apt343) that targets IF3N with the goal of elucidating its contribution to translation initiation. Rapid kinetics assays revealed that Apt343 reduces the rate of IF3 association with the 30S ribosomal subunit by 13-fold, while inducing a pronounced rearrangement of both IF3 domains on the 30S. These changes compromise IF2-, mRNA-, and fMet-tRNAfMet-dependent movements of IF3, delaying 30S initiation complex (30S IC) formation by up to two orders of magnitude. Cryo-EM analysis suggests that Apt343 may sterically clash with fMet-tRNAfMet, thereby perturbing the canonical pathway by which the initiator tRNA is accommodated after IF2-dependent recruitment and prior to start codon decoding. However, once the 30S IC is formed, blocking IF3N does not prevent 50S subunit joining or 70S IC assembly. Collectively, these findings support a role for IF3N in enhancing an efficient path for fMet-tRNAfMet accommodation towards the 30S IC and promoting IF3C displacement to unlock 50S recruitment. Moreover, this aptamer-based strategy offers a valuable tool for dissecting domain-specific activities of multidomain factors within complex environments such as the initiating ribosome. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=73 SRC="FIGDIR/small/643242v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (24K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e3c3b4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4592aeorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a104a0org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@36db94_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.