Back

Experimental reduction of land use increases invertebrate abundance but not diversity in grasslands

Staab, M.; Keller, A.; Achury, R.; Hilpert, A.; Hoelzel, N.; Prati, D.; Weisser, W. W.; Bluethgen, N.

2025-03-16 ecology
10.1101/2025.03.14.643238 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Grasslands are diverse ecosystems that are increasingly threatened by intensive land use. Restoring grasslands by reducing land-use intensity may support insect abundance and diversity, helping to halt insect declines. To test for the effect of reduced land use on invertebrates, we studied an experiment (established 2020) at 45 sites across three regions of Germany. We hypothesized that reduced land use increases invertebrate abundance and diversity, with larger effects in less intensively used grasslands. Using suction sampling, invertebrates were quantitatively sampled in May 2021 and May 2023, with 2021 samples identified by DNA meta-barcoding. Reducing land use to a single late mowing increased invertebrate abundance by 41% after one year and 99% after three years. However, species richness, Shannon diversity, and Simpson diversity did not differ between treatments and controls. Finding more individuals in grasslands with reduced land use suggests that species already present benefit, rather than additional species being recruited from the surrounding area. The effect of land-use reduction on abundance was consistently influenced by land use in the surrounding matrix, with larger positive effect sizes at grasslands with lower mowing frequency but higher fertilization. In spite of these local differences in the magnitude of restoration effects, the consistent increase in invertebrate abundance suggests that reducing land-use intensity can enhance invertebrate populations with potential benefits for ecosystem functions. It will be important to study how outcomes of land-use reduction develop over time, as land-use reduction is likely more successful when implemented permanently.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.1%
2
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.5%
50% of probability mass above
3
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
4
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
5
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
7
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
8
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
10
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
13
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
14
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
16
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
17
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
19
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
20
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
21
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
22
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
24
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
25
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%