AI Learning for Pediatric Right Ventricular Assessment: Development and Validation Across Multiple Centers
Reddy, C. D.; Yan, Y.; Qiu, M.; Tang, Y.; Jin, B.; Han, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhou, S.; Tang, Q.; Xiao, H.; Yang, S.; Wen, Q.; Wu, L.-P.; Fu, L.-J.; Jing, Z.-Y.; Yang, Y.-J.; Zhang, Y.-Q.; Ozawa, N.; Ichikawa, T.; Ling, E.; Wong, R. J.; Maric, I.; Aghaeepour, N.; Gaudilliere, B.; Angst, M. S.; Sylvester, K. G.; Cohen, H. J.; Darmstadt, G. L.; Stevenson, D. K.; Chubb, H.; Ceresnak, S. R.; Tandon, A.; McElhinney, D. B.; Zhang, H.; Ling, X. B.
Show abstract
BackgroundCongenital and acquired heart disease affects [~]1% of children globally, with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction being a common and complex issue due to conditions like congenital heart disease (CHD), pulmonary hypertension (PH), and prematurity. Accurate RV assessment is challenging due to its unique geometry, interventricular interactions, and morphological variability in pediatric patients. Fractional area change (FAC), a key echocardiographic measure, correlates strongly with disease severity, aiding in timely intervention and prognosis. AI learning shows the potential to automate and standardize RV assessments, overcoming traditional limitations and improving early diagnosis and management of pediatric cardiovascular disorders. MethodsUsing 24,984 echocardiograms from 3,993 pediatric patients across four tertiary care centers (one in North America, three in Asia), we developed and validated an AI framework for automated RV assessment. The framework employs multi-task learning to perform ventricular segmentation, beat-by-beat quantification of RV FAC, and identification of cardiac abnormalities like PH. It was also extended to enhance left ventricular (LV) functional assessment. FindingsOur AI system achieved Dice similarity coefficients of 0.86 (apical-four-chamber, A4C) and 0.88 (parasternal-short-axis, PSAX) for RV segmentation, matching expert annotations. It demonstrated robust RV functional assessment, with AUCs of 0.95 (U.S. cohort) and 0.97 (Asian cohort). For PH classification, diagnostic accuracies were 0.95 (U.S.) and 0.94 (Asian), confirming consistent performance across populations. When extended to LV assessment, the framework significantly improved LV ejection fraction (EF) prediction in both U.S. and Asian cohorts. InterpretationThis validated AI framework enables reliable, automated ventricular function analysis, matching expert-level performance. By enhancing clinical workflows and standardizing pediatric cardiac assessments, it has the potential to improve care management for pediatric cardiovascular disorders, particularly in resource-limited settings. FundingThis work was supported by the U.S. NIH 1R41HL160362-01 to XBL and K23HL150279 to AT.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Algorithm for Predicting Valvular Heart Disease from Heart Sounds in an Unselected Cohort 95%
- Fairness in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Assessing sex and racial bias in deep learning-based segmentation 94%
- DeepStrain: A Deep Learning Workflow for the Automated Characterization of Cardiac Mechanics 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcriptional Signatures of the Right Ventricle in End-Stage Heart Failure 92%
- Pulmonary Vascular Compromise is Associated with Survival in Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension: A New Computational Model 92%
- Persistence of Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients undergoing Ventricular Assist Devices and Orthotopic Heart Transplantation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-Invasive Scale Measurement of Cardiac Output Compared with the Gold-Standard Direct Fick Method: A Feasibility Study 93%
- Right Heart Remodeling After Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Patients with Pulmonary Atresia or Critical Stenosis with Intact Ventricular Septum 93%
- The HeartMagic prospective observational study protocol - characterizing subtypes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.