Back

Data-Driven Construction of Age-Structured Contact Networks

Murray Kearney, L.; Davis, E. L.; Keeling, M. J.

2025-03-17 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.03.14.25323980 medRxiv
Show abstract

Capturing the structure of a population and characterising contacts within the population are key to reliable projections of infectious disease. Two main elements of population structure - contact heterogeneity and age - have been repeatedly demonstrated to be key in infection dynamics, yet are rarely combined. Regarding individuals as nodes and contacts as edges within a network provides a powerful and intuitive method to fully realise this population structure. While there are a few key examples of contact networks being measured explicitly, in general we need to construct the appropriate networks from individual-level data. Here, using data from social contact surveys, we develop a generic and robust algorithm to generate an extrapolated network that preserves both age-structured mixing and heterogeneity in the number of contacts. We then use these networks to simulate the spread of infection through the population, constrained to have a given basic reproduction number (R0) and hence a given early growth rate. Given the over-dominant role that highly connected nodes ( superspreaders) would otherwise play in early dynamics, we scale transmission by the average duration of contacts, providing a better match to surveillance data for numbers of secondary cases. This network-based model shows that, for COVID-like parameters, including both heterogeneity and age-structure reduces both peak height and epidemic size compared to models that ignore heterogeneity. Our robust methodology therefore allows for the inclusion of the full wealth of data commonly collected by surveys but frequently overlooked to be incorporated into more realistic transmission models of infectious diseases.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.4%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
23.0%
3
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.5%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 26%
2.4%
7
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.9%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
9
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
10
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
11
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
13
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
14
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
15
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
16
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
17
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
18
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
19
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
20
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.5%