Translation, adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Abortion Attitude Scale - a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study among medical students
Lindig, A.; Christalle, E.; Zill, J. M.; Baumgart, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundUnintentionally pregnant individuals in Germany seeking an abortion face challenges due to legal regulations, stigma and difficult access to abortion care. Abortion attitudes of (prospective) physicians influence the care situation. To measure these attitudes, psychometrically sound instruments like the Abortion Attitude Scale (AAS) are necessary. So far, no instruments assessing attitudes toward abortions are available in German. The aim of this study is to translate, culturally adapt and psychometrically test the AAS. MethodsThis is a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study on abortion attitudes of medical students in Germany. The English 14-item AAS was translated into German and adapted using a team translation protocol. Comprehensibility was tested via cognitive interviews (n=10 medical students). We analyzed acceptance (completion rate), factorial structure (confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), model fit), item characteristics (response distribution, item difficulties, corrected item-total correlations, inter-item correlations), and reliability (McDonalds omega). ResultsThe translated and adapted AAS version was comprehensible. AAS data of 305 medical students could be included in analysis. Completion rate was above 98% for all items. The CFA results confirmed a one-factorial structure but a model without item 10 and correlations between item 8 and item 13 showed to have the best model fits. Floor or ceiling effects could be found for 7 items, item difficulties ranged between 0.39 and 0.94, corrected item-total-correlations ranged between 0.460 and 0.766 for the best model, inter-item correlations ranged between .129 to .681, and McDonalds omega was above 0.9 for both models. ConclusionThe German AAS is a brief measure with high acceptance and good psychometric properties. Removal of item 10 could be discussed. The AAS can ease and improve the evaluation of attitudes toward abortions in Germany. This can potentially lead to the development of targeted interventions to reduce barriers and improve care for unintentionally pregnant individuals.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge of Female Genital Cutting among health and social care professionals in Francophone Belgium: A cross-sectional survey 94%
- Knowledge, perception, and attitude toward premarital screening among university students in Kurdistan region- Iraq 94%
- Advancing the Safe Motherhood Initiative: a qualitative and sentiment analysis of local physician’s perspectives on antibiotic self-medication during pregnancy in a low- and middle-income country 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Desire to Avoid Pregnancy Scale: clinical considerations and comparison with other questions about pregnancy preferences 94%
- Early medical abortion using telemedicine – acceptability to patients 94%
- Should COVID-specific arrangements for abortion continue? The views of women experiencing abortion in Britain during the pandemic 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review 94%
- Caesarean birth in public maternities in Argentina: a formative research study on the views of obstetricians, midwives, and trainees 93%
- The Menstrual Practice Needs Scale Short Form (MPNS-SF) and Rapid (MPNS-R): Development in Khulna, Bangladesh, and validation in cross-sectional surveys from Bangladesh and Uganda 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey among women in Switzerland 96%
- Maternal Postpartum Stress Scale: Translation and validation study of the Chinese version 94%
- Women’s knowledge, attitudes and views of preconception health and intervention delivery methods: A cross-sectional survey 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.