Back

Mitigating the impact of motor impairment on self-administered digital tests in patients with neurological disorders

Gruia, D. C.; Giunchiglia, V.; Braban, A.; Parkinson, N.; Banerjee, S. C.; Kwan, J.; Hellyer, P. J.; Hampshire, A.; Geranmayeh, F.

2025-03-14 neurology
10.1101/2025.03.14.25323903
Show abstract

IntroductionCognitive impairments are prevalent in many neurological disorders and remain underdiagnosed and poorly studied longitudinally. Unsupervised remote cognitive testing is an accessible, scalable, and cost-effective solution, however it often fails to separate cognitive deficits from commonly co-occurring motor impairments. To address this gap, we present a computational framework that isolates cognitive ability from motor impairment in self-administered digital tasks. MethodsStroke was chosen as a representative neurological disorder, as patients frequently experience both motor and cognitive impairments. Our validation analyses spanned 18 computerised tasks completed by 171 patients longitudinally, covering a broad spectrum of cognitive and motor domains. The computational model was applied on trial-level data to disentangle the contribution of motor and cognitive processes. ResultsIn patients with motor hand impairment, standard accuracy performance metrics were confounded in 6 tasks (p<.05, FDR-corrected). In contrast, the Modelled Cognitive metrics obtained from the computational framework showed no significant effects of impaired hand (p>.05, FDR-corrected). Moreover, the Modelled Cognitive metrics correlated more strongly with clinical pen-and-paper scales (mean R2=0.64 vs. 0.43) and functional outcomes (mean R2=0.16 vs 0.09). Brain-behaviour associations were stronger when using the Modelled Cognitive metrics, and revealed intuitive multivariate relationships with individual tasks. InterpretationWe present converging evidence for the improved clinical utility and validity of the Modelled Cognitive metrics within neurological conditions characterised by co-occurring motor and cognitive deficits. Addressing the confounding effect of motor impairments improves the reliability and biological validity of self-administered digital assessments, enhances accessibility, and supports early detection and intervention across neurological disorders. FundingThis research is funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MR/T001402/1).

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 2%
9.9%
2
Brain
based on 69 papers
Top 2%
7.4%
3
Brain Communications
based on 79 papers
Top 1%
7.4%
4
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 25%
7.4%
5
NeuroImage: Clinical
based on 77 papers
Top 2%
6.2%
6
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 69%
4.9%
7
Human Brain Mapping
based on 53 papers
Top 2%
4.4%
8
Cortex
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
based on 26 papers
Top 2%
2.5%
10
Annals of Neurology
based on 43 papers
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 7%
2.3%
12
Neurology
based on 38 papers
Top 4%
2.3%
13
Journal of Neurology
based on 22 papers
Top 2%
2.2%
14
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
based on 31 papers
Top 3%
2.2%
15
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
based on 22 papers
Top 2%
1.7%
16
NeuroImage
based on 36 papers
Top 3%
1.5%
17
PLOS Digital Health
based on 88 papers
Top 8%
1.5%
18
BMC Neurology
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
1.5%
19
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
based on 28 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
20
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 46%
1.3%
21
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
22
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
23
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
based on 22 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Epilepsia
based on 27 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Alzheimer's & Dementia
based on 84 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Scientific Data
based on 30 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
27
npj Parkinson's Disease
based on 35 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
28
European Journal of Neurology
based on 20 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Brain Stimulation
based on 27 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Neuro-Oncology Advances
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
0.7%