Back

Evolutionary refinement of mitochondrial and plastid targeting sequences coincides with the late diversification of land plants

Raval, P. K.; Garcia, C. G.; Sanchez, M.-D. S.; Gould, S. B.

2025-03-15 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.03.13.643027 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plastids and mitochondria are key to plant survival and adaptation. The evolutionary progress of land plants (embryophytes) witnessed gene and genome duplications, and the expansion of organelle-localised proteins. To deal with the increase of nuclear-encoded proteins, targeting to and import by the mitochondrion and plastid is known to have adapted in multiple ways. It included the addition of entire new import channels and lineage-specific import receptors. Through comparative genomics and experimental biology, we uncover further changes of the organelle import machineries. Their evolution likely served to enhance the rate of protein import and improved its physiological regulation, e.g. via interactions between the import channel and respiratory complex. On the cargo side, nuclear-encoded N-terminal targeting sequences of mitochondrial (mNTS) and plastidal (pNTS) proteins diverged in their charge via a preference for phosphorylatable amino acids (adding negative charges after phosphorylation) and an avoidance of positive charges in the pNTS, which is most evident in eudicots. Using Chlamydomonas and Marchantia, we experimentally underscore that the evolved NTS divergence prevents mis-sorting between mitochondria and plastids. In line with the increase of phosphorylatable amino acids in the pNTS, we pinpoint the embryophytic origin of a membrane-anchored phosphatase, PAP2, that is associated with targeting sequence processing. On the whole, we propose a revised model for plant organelle protein import evolution from algae to angiosperms, which facilitated flourishing of this lineage on the land.

Published in Molecular Biology and Evolution (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.