Back

Hyper-responsiveness of cancer stem cells to microenvironmental cues controls metastasis and therapy response through YAP/TAZ/TEAD

Tang, B.; Minin, J.; Gonzalez, V.; Khan, Z.; Raviv, Y.; Yang, Y.-a.; Carney, C.; Millman, Z.; Grun, D.; Pineda, C. M.; Sharma, A.; Esposito, D.; Yan, H.; Huang, J.; Tran, A. D.; Kruhlak, M.; Yang, H. H.; Lee, M. P.; Wakefield, L. M.

2025-03-15 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.03.13.643008 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are key drivers of metastasis and therapy resistance but have been challenging to visualize and study in situ. Using a fluorescent CSC reporter, we observed very different population dynamics for CSCs and nonCSCs during metastatic lung colonization in breast cancer models. CSC expansive self-renewal drives early lesion formation before switching to a maintenance mode of balanced self-renewal and differentiation, whereupon nonCSC proliferation takes over as the main driver of metastatic expansion. Mechanistic analyses showed that CSCs are hyper-responsive to microenvironmental cues such as cell crowding and nutrient availability, suggesting a novel role for CSCs as sensors and early responders to fluctuating local conditions in the tumor. Incoming signals converge on YAP/TAZ/TEAD, with heightened CSC sensitivity and response supported by elevated receptor expression and increased chromatin accessibility around enhancers with TEAD binding sites. Targeting inputs to the YAP/TAZ/TEAD node reversed chemotherapy-induced enrichment of CSCs in lung metastases. HighlightsO_LIDifferent population dynamics for breast cancer stem cells (CSCs) and their differentiated progeny in early metastatic colonization C_LIO_LICSCs are hyper-responsive to microenvironmental cues and serve as sensors of local conditions for the tumor C_LIO_LIMany microenvironmental inputs converge on YAP/TAZ to regulate self-renewal vs differentiation fate decisions in the CSC C_LIO_LITargeting YAP/TAZ input pathways blocks chemotherapy-induced enrichment of CSCs C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.