Back

The experimentally evolved fluconazole-resistant Clade II isolates of Candidozyma auris exhibit a distinct lipid compositional landscape, highlighting intra-clade sphingolipid heterogeneity

kumar, P.; Ali, B.; Kumar, M.; Carolus, H.; Romero, C. L.; Vergauwen, R.; Chauhan, A.; Narayanan, A.; Banerjee, A.; Gaur, N. A.; Singh, A.; Van Dijck, P.; Chakrabarti, A.; Rudramurthy, S. P. M.; Sanyal, K.; Prasad, R.

2025-03-13 microbiology
10.1101/2025.03.13.642928 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The intrinsic resistance of Candidozyma auris to antifungal drugs poses a major therapeutic challenge, with conventional resistance mechanisms providing only partial explanations. Sphingolipids (SLs), known for their interclade heterogeneity, play a crucial role in antifungal resistance. This study examined the SL landscape in two drug-susceptible clade II isolates, C-line and P-line, from distinct geographical origins, which were experimentally evolved to develop stable fluconazole (FLC) resistance. The progenitors displayed distinct SL profiles, P1 had higher PhytoCer and OHPhytoCer, indicating a more active acidic SL biosynthesis branch, whereas C1 exhibited elevated OHGlcCer, OHCer, and LCBs, reflecting a greater role of the neutral biosynthesis branch. The principal component analysis (PCA) also confirmed distinct segregation of the two progenitors. Upon evolution, P1.1 and C1.1 adaptors showed significant SL alterations. P1.1 exhibited PhytoCer enrichment, while C1.1 showed reduced OHGlcCer alongside increased PhytoCer, dhCer and OHPhytoCer levels. Notably, OHGlcCer remained unchanged in P1.1, whereas LCBs and OHPhytoCer decreased compared to P1. Despite these lineage-specific differences between the progenitors, both evolved replicates exhibited increased PhytoCer as a common denominator like what is also observed in clinical FLC-resistant isolates. These findings highlight intra-clade SL variability and suggest that specific SLs contribute to FLC resistance in C. auris.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.