Finding the Forest in the Trees: Using Machine Learning and Online Cognitive and Perceptual Measures to Predict Adult Autism Diagnosis
Van der Burg, E.; Jertberg, R. M.; Geurts, H. M.; Chakrabarti, B.; Begeer, S.
Show abstract
Traditional subjective measures are limited in the insight they provide into underlying behavioral differences associated with autism and, accordingly, their ability to predict diagnosis. Performance-based measures offer an attractive alternative, being designed to capture neuropsychological constructs more directly and objectively. However, due to the heterogeneity of autism, differences in any one specific neuropsychological domain are inconsistently detected. Meanwhile, protracted wait times for diagnostic interviews delay access to care, highlighting the importance of developing better methods for identifying individuals likely to be autistic and understanding the associated behavioral differences. We disseminated a battery of online tasks measuring multisensory perception, emotion recognition, and executive function to a large group of autistic and non-autistic adults. We then used machine learning to classify participants and reveal which factors from the resulting dataset were most predictive of diagnosis. Not only were these measures able to predict autism in a late-diagnosed population known to be particularly difficult to identify, their combination with the most popular screening questionnaire enhanced its predictive accuracy (reaching 92% together). This indicates that performance-based measures may be a promising means of predicting autism, providing complementary information to existing screening questionnaires. Many variables in which significant group differences were not detected had predictive value in combination, suggesting complex latent relationships associated with autism. Machine learnings ability to harness these connections and pinpoint the most crucial features for prediction could allow optimization of a screening tool that offers a unique marriage of predictive accuracy and accessibility.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of autism spectrum disorder diagnosis using nonlinear measures of language-related EEG at 6 and 12 months 94%
- Pupil responses to social stimuli are associated with adaptive behaviors across the first 24 months of life 93%
- Reduced Lateralization of Multiple Functional Brain Networks in Autistic Males 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Imputing cognitive impairment in SPARK, a large autism cohort 94%
- Towards a cumulative science of vocal markers of autism: a cross-linguistic meta-analysis-based investigation of acoustic markers in American and Danish autistic children 93%
- Erroneous inference based on a lack of preference within one group: autism, mice, and the Social Approach Task. 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.