Back

GWAS on short tandem repeats identifies novel genetic mechanisms in Alzheimer's disease

Gmelin, D.; Ohlei, O.; Aslam, M. M.; Parkkinen, L.; Mullin, K.; Prokopenko, D.; Lill, C. M.; Tanzi, R. E.; Dobricic, V.; Bertram, L.

2025-03-13 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2025.03.13.25323833 medRxiv
Show abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) are typically based on the analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and often exclude more complex genetic variants, such as short tandem repeats (STRs). Here, we report the results of GWAS analyses systematically assessing the role of STRs, both imputed and directly genotyped by whole genome sequencing (WGS), on risk for Alzheimers disease (AD) in a large collection of [~]330,000 individuals (3,287 AD cases; 47,048 AD-by-proxy cases, 283,111 controls) from the UK biobank. Using imputed (or WGS-derived) STR genotype data, we identified 14 (WGS: one) independent loci showing evidence for genome-wide significant association with AD risk. While most identified loci had already been highlighted by SNP-based GWAS, we detected new STR-based signals near the genes SNX32 (chr. 11q13) and WBS1 (chr. 17q11). In addition, we delineated several other loci where STRs (and not SNPs) either represent the lead signal (ABCA7) or make substantial contributions to the SNP-driven associations (HLA-DRB1, MINDY/ADAM10, and APOE). Heritability analyses estimated that STRs account for at least 3% of the total phenotypic variance of AD in this dataset. Aligning our top STRs with DNA methylation and transcriptome profiles from human brain samples suggests that several STRs may unfold their effects by impacting gene expression. Future work needs to confirm our results and delineate the likely considerable role that STRs play in the genetic makeup of AD.

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.