Back

Screening for Maternally Inherited Diabetes and Deafness in Large Cohorts of Hearing Impaired and Diabetic Patients

Varga, L.; Borecka, S.; Skopkova, M.; Rambani, V.; Sklenar, M.; Cipkova, K.; Kickova, T.; Ugorova, D.; Kabatova, Z.; Stanik, J.; Profant, M.; Gasperikova, D.

2025-03-17 endocrinology
10.1101/2025.03.13.25321027
Show abstract

ObjectivesMitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations account for up to 5% of hereditary hearing loss cases. Most commonly, the m.3243A>G mtDNA variant contributes to rare monogenic MIDD (Maternally Inherited Diabetes and Deafness) or MELAS (Mitochondrial Encephalopathy, Lactic Acidosis, and Stroke-like episodes) syndromes. Different proportions of the mutated mtDNA (heteroplasmy) among the affected tissues result in variability in the clinical manifestation and severity of the phenotype. The aim of the presented study was to establish the prevalence of the m.3243A>G variant in large cohorts of hearing-impaired and diabetic patients in Slovakia and to evaluate the genotype-phenotype correlations and long-term cochlear implantation outcomes. DesignProbands (n=5957) were recruited via three independent nationwide studies on hereditary hearing loss (n=1145) and diabetes (unselected diabetes group, n=4158 and Monogenic diabetes group, n=654; total n=4812). DNA from peripheral blood and/or buccal mucosa was tested for the presence of the m.3243A>G variant using two PCR methods - qPCR and dPCR. Audiological and other clinical data of the identified variant carriers were also collected for phenotype evaluation. ResultsWe identified 25 probands/families harboring the m.3243A>G variant (0.42%). The prevalence was higher in the groups where monogenic disorder was suspected - 0.79% in the Hearing loss group and 1.68% in the Monogenic diabetes group versus 0.14% in the general diabetes group (p < 0.001). Heteroplasmy levels assessed by dPCR ranged between 0.04% and 76% in peripheral blood and 0.01% and 92% in buccal samples. In most individuals, the symptoms manifested in the fourth decade of life in affected subjects with the MIDD phenotype or isolated hearing loss/diabetes, but as early as in the second decade in the probands with MELAS. We observed high phenotype variability, ranging from severe multisystemic involvement through isolated symptoms to asymptomatic young "dormant" or very low heteroplasmy carriers. Only 54% of individuals with the m.3243A>G variant had both diabetes and hearing loss. The heteroplasmy levels from buccal swabs showed a better correlation with the age of onset of both hearing loss and diabetes than the age-adjusted blood heteroplasmy. On the other hand, the age-adjusted blood heteroplasmy was associated with overall severity of the disease (i.e., with a higher number of clinical symptoms). We show that the most typical audiogram configurations are flat and sloping. Three individuals identified as cochlear implant recipients showed excellent and long-term stable functional outcomes. In addition, the authors report the first case of successful stapes surgery in a patient with confirmed mitochondrial disorder. ConclusionsThe diagnostic yield was higher in the deafness and monogenic diabetes groups than in the unselected diabetes group. Implementation of rigorous inclusion criteria requiring the presence of both diabetes and hearing loss may lead to a lower detection rate due to different or incomplete phenotype manifestation. Age-adjusted blood heteroplasmy levels seem to be a good predictor of overall severity of m.3243A>G-associated diseases, but buccal mucosa heteroplasmy better predicted the age of hearing loss and diabetes onset. We further confirm that cochlear implantation and stapedectomy are safe and efficient options for hearing restoration and rehabilitation in m.3243A>G carriers.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 5%
14.1%
2
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
based on 26 papers
Top 0.6%
11.9%
3
Journal of Medical Genetics
based on 22 papers
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 70%
4.8%
5
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
based on 39 papers
Top 0.5%
3.0%
6
Frontiers in Endocrinology
based on 20 papers
Top 1%
3.0%
7
Biology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
3.0%
8
Cell Reports Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 2%
2.6%
9
Human Molecular Genetics
based on 28 papers
Top 1%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Genome Medicine
based on 56 papers
Top 3%
2.5%
11
The American Journal of Human Genetics
based on 77 papers
Top 4%
2.5%
12
Diabetes
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
1.7%
13
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 19%
1.4%
14
Schizophrenia
based on 13 papers
Top 0.8%
1.4%
15
Genetics in Medicine
based on 57 papers
Top 4%
1.4%
16
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
17
Diabetologia
based on 23 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
18
Diabetes Care
based on 11 papers
Top 0.9%
1.4%
19
EMBO Molecular Medicine
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 12%
1.3%
21
npj Genomic Medicine
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
22
The Journal of Pediatrics
based on 15 papers
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 11%
0.9%
24
Life Science Alliance
based on 11 papers
Top 0.2%
0.9%
25
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Clinical and Translational Medicine
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
0.9%
27
PLOS Genetics
based on 39 papers
Top 4%
0.9%
28
European Journal of Human Genetics
based on 25 papers
Top 2%
0.9%
29
European Respiratory Journal
based on 44 papers
Top 5%
0.9%
30
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 42%
0.7%