Uncovering the isoform-resolution kinetic landscape of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay with EZbakR
Mabin, J. W.; Vock, I. W.; Machyna, M.; Haque, N.; Thakran, P.; Zhang, A.; Rai, G.; Leibler, I. N.-M.; Inglese, J.; Simon, M. D.; Hogg, J. R.
Show abstract
Cellular RNA levels are a product of synthesis and degradation kinetics, which can differ among transcripts of the same gene. An important cause of isoform-specific decay is the nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) pathway, which degrades transcripts with premature termination codons (PTCs) and other features. Understanding NMD functions requires strategies to quantify isoform kinetics; however, current approaches remain limited. Methods like nucleotide-recoding RNA-seq (NR-seq) enable insights into RNA kinetics, but existing bioinformatic tools do not provide robust, isoform-specific degradation rate constant estimates. We extend the EZbakR-suite by implementing a strategy to infer isoform-level kinetics from short-read NR-seq data. This approach uncovers unexpected variability in NMD efficiency among transcripts with conserved PTC-containing exons and rapid decay of a subset of mRNAs lacking PTCs. Our findings highlight the effects of competition between NMD and other decay pathways, provide mechanistic insights into established NMD efficiency correlates, and identify transcript features promoting efficient decay.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Normalisr: normalization and association testing for single-cell CRISPR screen and co-expression 95%
- Expanded palette of RNA base editors for comprehensive RBP-RNA interactome studies 95%
- Integrative analysis reveals RNA G-Quadruplexes in UTRs are selectively constrained and enriched for functional associations 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.