Back

Pharmacometric Generative Stochastic Modeling of Patient Reported Outcome Measures

Bisaso, K. R.; Kadada, K. R.; Bisaso, S. K.; Mukonzo, J.; Ette, E. I.

2025-03-13 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2025.03.12.25323869 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background/ObjectivesPatient reported outcome measures (PROMs) capture the patients own perspective on their health, illness, and therapeutic effects on the illness. However, their analysis and interpretation is challenging due to their multidimensional nature, poor correlation with clinical and physiological outcomes, lack of a standardized interpretation, and discrete nature of the data. We describe a generative stochastic modeling approach and show that it improves the pharmacometric characterization of multi-item PROMS. MethodsThe Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM) modelling approach was described and used to model the relationship between efavirenz mid-dose concentrations,clinical variables (CD count and Viral load) and time varying patient reported neuropsychological impairment symptoms. The model was used to derive a variable importance ranking for all the PROM items, clinical variables, and drug concentrations. ResultsThe model adequately characterizes the PROMs. Variable importance ranking reveals that mid-dose concentrations are not more predictive of post-baseline PROMs than clinical variables and baseline PROMs. ConclusionsGenerative stochastic modeling with RBMs adequately characterizes PROMS and their relationship to other variables and drug concentrations, is readily adaptable to the pharmacometric workflow, and is able to generate individual level disease progression trajectories using baseline variables.

Published in Academia Drug Development and Pharmacotherapy · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.