Polygenic prediction of fear learning is mediated by brain connectivity
Kumsta, R.; Schneider Penate, J. E.; Gomes, C. A.; Spisak, T.; Genc, E.; Merz, C. J.; Wolf, O. T.; Quick, H. H.; Elsenbruch, S.; Engler, H.; Fraenz, C.; Metzen, D.; Ernst, T. M.; Thieme, A.; Batsikadze, G.; Hagedorn, B.; Timmann, D.; Guentuerkuen, O.; Axmacher, N.
Show abstract
BackgroundGenetic variants may impact connectivity in the fear network such that genetically driven alterations of network properties (partially) explain individual differences in learning. Our aim was to identify genetic indices that predict physiological measures of fear learning mediated by MRI-based connectivity. MethodsWe built prediction models using exploratory mediation analysis. Predictors were polygenic scores for several psychological disorders, neuroticism, cross-disorder risk, cognitive traits, and gene expression-based scores. Candidate mediators were structural and functional connectivity estimates between the hippocampus, amygdala, dorsal anterior cingulate, ventromedial prefrontal cortex and cerebellar nuclei. Learning measures based on skin conductance responses to conditioned fear stimuli (CS+), conditioned safety cues (CS-), and differential learning (CS+ vs. CS-), for both acquisition and extinction training served as outcomes. ResultsReliable prediction of learning indices was achieved by means of conventional polygenic score construction but also by modelling cross-trait and trait-specific effects of genetic variants. A latent factor of disorder risk as well as major depressive disorder conditioned on other traits were related to the acquisition of conditioned fear. Polygenic scores for short-term memory showed an association with safety cue learning. During extinction, genetic indices for neuroticism and verbal learning were predictive of CS+ and differential learning, respectively. While mediation effects depended on connectivity modality, prediction of fear involved all regions of interest. Expression-based scores showed no associations. ConclusionsOur findings highlight the utility of leveraging pleiotropy to improve complex trait prediction and brain connectivity as a promising endophenotype to understand the pathways between genetic variation and fear expression.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Connectome dysfunction in patients at clinical high risk for psychosis and modulation by oxytocin 94%
- Replicability of Structural Brain Alterations Associated with General Psychopathology: Evidence from a Population-Representative Birth Cohort 93%
- Transcriptomic pathology of neocortical microcircuit cell types across psychiatric disorders 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel polygenic risk score as a translational tool linking depression-related changes in the corticolimbic transcriptome with neural face processing and anhedonic symptoms 96%
- Genetic factors influencing a neurobiological substrate for psychiatric disorders 95%
- Psychotic-like experiences, polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia and structural properties of the salience, default mode and central-executive networks in healthy participants from UK Biobank 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deviations from normative functioning underlying emotional episodic memory revealed cross-scale neurodiverse alterations linked to affective symptoms in distinct psychiatric disorders 94%
- Model-based EEG phenotyping uncovers distinct neurocomputational mechanisms underlying learning impairments across psychopathologies 94%
- Functional Coupling and Longitudinal Outcome Prediction in First-Episode Psychosis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Maladaptive avoidance learning in the orbitofrontal cortex in adolescents with major depression 96%
- A miR-137-related biological pathway of risk for Schizophrenia is associated with human brain emotion processing 95%
- Manifold learning uncovers nonlinear interactions between the adolescent brain and environment that predict emotional and behavioral problems 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.