Deep Learning Models for Radiography Body-part Classification and Chest Radiograph Projection/Orientation Classification: A Multi-institutional Study
Mitsuyama, Y.; Takita, H.; Walston, S. L.; Watanabe, K.; Ishimaru, S.; Miki, Y.; Ueda, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundLarge-scale radiographic datasets often include errors in labels such as body-part or projection, which can undermine automated image analysis. PurposeTo develop and externally validate two deep learning models--one for categorizing radiographs by body-part, and another for identifying projection and rotation of chest radiographs--using large, diverse datasets. MethodsWe retrospectively collected radiographs from multiple institutions and public repositories. For the first model (Xp-Bodypart-Checker), we included seven categories (Head, Neck, Chest, Incomplete Chest, Abdomen, Pelvis, Extremities). For the second model (CXp-Projection-Rotation-Checker), we classified chest radiographs by projection (anterior-posterior, posterior-anterior, lateral) and rotation (upright, inverted, left rotation, right rotation). Both models were trained, tuned, and internally tested on separate data, then externally tested on radiographs from different institutions. Model performance was assessed using overall accuracy (micro, macro, and weighted) as well as one-vs-all area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). ResultsIn the Xp-Bodypart-Checker development phase, we included 429,341 radiographs obtained from Institutions A, B, and MURA. In the CXp-Projection-Rotation-Checker development phase, we included 463,728 chest radiographs from CheXpert, PadChest, and Institution A. The Xp-Bodypart-Checker achieved AUC values of 1.00 (99% CI: 1.00-1.00) for all classes other than Incomplete Chest, which had an AUC value of 0.99 (99% CI: 0.98- 1.00). The CXp-Projection-Rotation-Checker demonstrated AUC values of 1.00 (99% CI: 1.00-1.00) across all projection and rotation classifications. ConclusionThese models help automatically verify image labels in large radiographic databases, improving quality control across multiple institutions.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Detecting Signs of Tuberculosis on Chest Radiographs among US-bound Immigrants and Refugees 96%
- Designing a computer-assisted diagnosis system for cardiomegaly detection and radiology report generation 95%
- A Comparison of CXR-CAD Software to Radiologists in Identifying COVID-19 in Individuals Evaluated for Sars CoV 2 Infection in Malawi and Zambia 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing GPT-4 Multimodal Performance in Radiological Image Analysis 94%
- From Community Acquired Pneumonia to COVID-19: A Deep Learning Based Method for Quantitative Analysis of COVID-19 on thick-section CT Scans 93%
- Observer agreement and clinical significance of chest CT reporting in patients suspected of COVID-19 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 96%
- ai-corona : Radiologist-Assistant Deep Learning Framework for COVID-19 Diagnosis in Chest CT Scans 94%
- Classification performance bias between training and test sets in a limited mammography dataset 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Toward Understanding COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Deep-learning-based Approach for Severity Analysis and Monitoring the Disease 95%
- Tracking And Predicting COVID-19 Radiological Trajectory Using Deep Learning On Chest X-Rays: Initial Accuracy Testing 94%
- COVID-Classifier: An automated machine learning model to assist in the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection in chest x-ray images 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantification of abdominal fat from computed tomography using deep learning and its association with electronic health records in an academic biobank 94%
- Automated stratification of trauma injury severity across multiple body regions using multi-modal, multi-class machine learning models 91%
- ENRICHing Medical Imaging Training Sets Enables More Efficient Machine Learning 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.