Back

Genomic Landscape of Macrolide Resistance in High-Burden Bacterial Pathogens: Implications for Antimicrobial Stewardship in Resource-Limited Settings

Ameke, S. L.; Ameke, S. L.; Agbovi, S.

2025-03-12 microbiology
10.1101/2025.03.11.642729 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) threatens global health, with macrolide resistance emerging as a critical challenge in high-burden pathogens. Understanding taxon-specific resistance mechanisms is essential for guiding interventions in resource-limited settings where diagnostic and therapeutic resources are constrained. MethodsWe analyzed 9,706 bacterial genomes from the AMRFinderPlus database to characterize macrolide resistance alleles, their distribution across taxa, and associations with multidrug resistance. Statistical and visualization workflows identified taxon-specific patterns and clinical implications. ResultsMacrolide resistance mechanisms dominated (34% of 1,243 alleles), with 23S rRNA mutations prevalent in Neisseria gonorrhoeae (23S_A2045G: 62%; 23S_A2057G: 58%) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (23S_A2058G: 48%). Efflux pump variants (acrB_R717L/Q) drove multidrug resistance in Escherichia spp. (41%) and Salmonella spp. (33%), correlating with cross-resistance to fluoroquinolones (18%) and tetracyclines (14%). These pathogens disproportionately impact regions like Ghana, where syndromic management and antibiotic misuse amplify resistance. ConclusionsThese findings underscore the urgent need for precision surveillance and context-specific stewardship to combat macrolide resistance in high-burden pathogens, particularly in resource-limited settings where diagnostic and therapeutic gaps exacerbate AMR threats. Targeted interventions, including affordable molecular diagnostics and antibiotic access reforms, are critical to mitigating global health disparities driven by resistance.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.