Atomistic Profiling of KRAS Interactions with Monobodies and Affimer Proteins Through Ensemble-Based Mutational Scanning Unveils Conserved Residue Networks Linking Cryptic Pockets and Regulating Mechanisms of Binding, Specificity and Allostery
Alshahrani, M.; Parikh, V.; Foley, B.; Hu, G.; Verkhivker, G.
Show abstract
KRAS, a historically "undruggable" oncogenic driver, has eluded targeted therapies due to its lack of accessible binding pockets in its active state. This study investigates the conformational dynamics, binding mechanisms, and allosteric communication networks of KRAS in complexes with monobodies (12D1, 12D5) and affimer proteins (K6, K3, K69) to characterize the binding and allosteric mechanisms and hotspots of KRAS binding. Through molecular dynamics simulations, mutational scanning, binding free energy analysis and network-based analyses, we identified conserved allosteric hotspots that serve as critical nodes for long-range communication in KRAS. Key residues in {beta}-strand 4 (F78, L80, F82), -helix 3 (I93, H95, Y96), {beta}-strand 5 (V114, N116), and -helix 5 (Y157, L159, R164) consistently emerged as hotspots across diverse binding partners, forming contiguous networks linking functional regions of KRAS. Notably, {beta}-strand 4 acts as a central hub for propagating conformational changes, while the cryptic allosteric pocket centered around H95/Y96 positions targeted by clinically approved inhibitors was identified as a universal hotspot for both binding and allostery. The study also reveals the interplay between structural rigidity and functional flexibility, where stabilization of one region induces compensatory flexibility in others, reflecting KRASs adaptability to perturbations. We found that monobodies stabilize the switch II region of KRAS, disrupting coupling between switch I and II regions and leading to enhanced mobility in switch I of KRAS. Similarly, affimer K3 leverages the 3-helix as a hinge point to amplify its effects on KRAS dynamics. Mutational scanning and binding free energy analysis highlighted the energetic drivers of KRAS interactions. revealing key hotspot residues, including H95 and Y96 in the 3 helix, as major contributors to binding affinity and selectivity. Network analysis identified {beta}-strand 4 as a central hub for propagating conformational changes, linking distant functional sites. The predicted allosteric hotspots strongly aligned with experimental data, validating the robustness of the computational approach. Despite distinct binding interfaces, shared hotspots highlight a conserved allosteric infrastructure, reinforcing their universal importance in KRAS signaling. The results of this study can inform rational design of small-molecule inhibitors that mimic the effects of monobodies and affimer proteins, challenging the "undruggable" reputation of KRAS.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Mutational Scanning of Dynamic Interaction Networks in the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Complexes: Allosteric Hotspots Control Functional Mimicry and Resilience to Mutational Escape 97%
- Markov State Models and Perturbation-Based Approaches Reveal Distinct Dynamic Signatures and Hidden Allosteric Pockets in the Emerging SARS-Cov-2 Spike Omicron Variants Complexes with the Host Receptor: The Interplay of Dynamics and Convergent Evolution Modulates Allostery and Functional Mechanisms 97%
- mTOR variants activation discovers PI3K-like cryptic pocket, expanding allosteric, mutant-selective inhibitor designs 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Coevolutionary Analysis and Perturbation-Based Network Modeling of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Complexes with Antibodies: Binding-Induced Control of Dynamics, Allosteric Interactions and Signaling 96%
- Computational Analysis of Energy Landscapes Reveals Dynamic Features that Contribute to Binding of Inhibitors to CFTR-Associated Ligand 95%
- Microtubule severing enzymes oligomerization and allostery: a tale of two domains 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.