Back

Subliminal risk influences subjective value in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex

Fernandes, P.; Lee, S.; Kable, J. W.; Seidel, P.; Almeida, J.; Eriksson, J.; de Sousa, B.; Bergstrom, F.

2025-03-13 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.03.11.642695 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The relationship between conscious awareness and decisions has been heavily debated. Here we investigated whether subliminal probabilities are integrated with conscious rewards to form subjective value (SV) representations in the anterior ventral striatum (aVS) and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). Participants played an incentivized competitive game with risky choice to accumulate points across trials in a behavioral and fMRI experiment. The game was a modified attentional-blink paradigm that rendered a probability cue unseen (indicating a 100% or 0% chance to win a risky reward). Following the probability cue, participants chose between a safe (1 point with certainty) or risky option (>1 or 0 points depending on probability cue). The risky reward was either 2 or 5 points, varying across trials. In some trials the probability cue was absent (replaced by a random distractor) and the probability to win the risky reward was 50%. When probability cues were unseen, they did not influence choice, as value-maximizing choice (d) was not greater than chance, but they did influence reaction time in both experiments. Consistent with SV integration, the BOLD signal in aVS and vmPFC was higher for both conscious rewards (high > low) and subliminal probabilities (high > low) and could not be explained by subliminal salience (cue present > absent). Moreover, multivariate pattern similarity between conscious rewards and subliminal probabilities in vmPFC suggest integration into an abstract value representation. Additionally, we found brain-wide subliminal probability and salience effects. Taken together, these results suggest that conscious awareness is not necessary for probability to be integrated with conscious rewards to form an abstract "common currency" SV representation in vmPFC. Additionally, brain-wide subliminal probability and salience effects suggests information can have "global access" without conscious awareness.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.6%
2
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
4
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
6
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
7
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.9%
10
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
11
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
14
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
15
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
16
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
19
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
20
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
21
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
23
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.0%
26
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
27
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
28
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
29
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%