Back

A Method To Calibrate Chemical Agnostic Quantitative Adverse Outcome Pathways On Multiple Chemical Dose-Response Data

Zhou, Z.; Sahlin, U.

2025-03-13 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.03.11.642550 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Quantitative Adverse Outcome Pathways (qAOPs) may support next-generation risk assessment by integrating New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) for derivation of points of departure. To be useful, a qAOP should be chemical-agnostic. However, existing qAOP studies often pool multi-chemical data without adequately addressing inter-chemical heterogeneity. Consequently, fundamental pathway relationships become obscured by heterogeneity-induced noise, thereby compromising the reliability of chemical-agnostic predictions. We developed a chemical-agnostic calibration approach to addresses this challenge by leveraging hierarchical structures to systematically separate chemical-specific heterogeneity from underlying pathway effects. Through this methodological framework, chemical-specific deviations are explicitly modeled as random effects, enabling the extraction of pathway-level parameters that represent core mechanistic relationships independent of individual chemical properties. Through simulation studies across varying heterogeneity levels, we demonstrate that performance differences between models with and without hierarchical calibration reveal the magnitude of heterogeneity in the data. Moreover, when heterogeneity is substantial, an uncalibrated qAOP should not be considered truly chemical-agnostic in practice, as it confounds pathway-level effects with chemical-specific variation. We demonstrated the application of this calibration approach through a case study of non-mutagenic liver tumor. The framework proposed in this study enhances qAOP generalizability while preserving the chemical-agnostic principle, supporting robust NAMs-based next-generation risk assessments. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=89 SRC="FIGDIR/small/642550v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (23K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e7011eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1fa7be9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1dd0b52org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1123a93_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG Figure 1: For TOC only C_FIG

Published in Chemical Research in Toxicology (predicted rank #10) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 2%
15.4%
2
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
3
Environment International
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.4%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.4%
6
Toxicological Sciences
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.9%
Chemical Research in Toxicology · published here
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
12
Environmental Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Water Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
18
Journal of Cheminformatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
19
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
20
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
The Annals of Applied Statistics
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
22
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
24
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.9%
25
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
26
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
27
MethodsX
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
28
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%